Posted by Leastofthese [Leastofthese] on November 26, 1999 at 14:48:44 {2lTH7z2znEYIiNdpPK7.di7nyYLfJI}:
In Reply to: *Bibleman EXPOSED! posted by proplog2 on November 26, 1999 at 13:52:36:
Proplog2,
FYI - I can't allow myself to be equated with Bibleman. Not that I am a little nutsoid at times but certainly not thinking I am Jesus Christ himself - "the one and only incarnate as of 1992."
Although I am of the anointed, thus a part of Christ's bride, and in that sense I post with a feminine nature; I am in flesh - definitely masculine, yet even more definitely not Bibleman.
I am not insulted by your considering me a female but I am highly insulted at your implication that I am Bibleman.
I have exchanged e-mail privately with Bibleman and that is how I discovered his real name, his IP address, his living circumstances, plus that he is a disfellowshipped male of middle age. Though he claims to be also black is not provable without a photo.
I have decided not to debate publically with him but would consider a private topical discussion of the real return of Jesus Christ, in order to help him see the reality instead of what I consider his overactive immagination.
Out of courtesy I also gave him the information on how to sign up for and use ICQ. That is simply because I like ICQ for private chat!
Now I don't hate this man, instead I feel he needs to learn more about Jesus' parousia, his return also in the flesh as the coming one. See Revelation 22:17 & 22:20-21.
In my opinion, Bibleman feels he has some kind of monopoly upon being Christ filled by means of holy spirit and that no other can thus represent Christ Jesus since 1992.
Sadly for his sake - we of the remnant who are genuinely of the Bride of Christ know he does not yet fully understand such calling. Perhaps he one day will, but then he will have to study harder about the relationship all the anointed have with Jesus and with each other as Jehovah purposed it to become...
Least of These!