Posted by bJ [barJonah] on November 26, 1999 at 14:44:42 {2lTH7z2znEciGsuY5KW2s3Or3XCK4s}:
In Reply to: *BIBLEMAN WHADDA YA THINK? posted by Bibleman on November 26, 1999 at 13:39:50:
But specifically with these genealogy lists, "father" could be either grandfather, father-in-law or under(via brother-in-law marriage), so it's technically correct, particularly since this is in the context of genealogy lists.
Garbage. Been there, done that. You're shameless to keep repeating this tripe after the mauling it got the last time.
bJ
-----