Posted by Bibleman [Bibleman] on November 26, 1999 at 14:01:36 {2lTH7z2znEMSSTtTA17sslyACFuF8c}:
In Reply to: *BIBLEMAN AND EVOLUTION posted by OneGlove on November 26, 1999 at 11:06:51:
Oh, this is sooo infantile.
Guess what? You believe in evolution? So do I?
A single human cell becomes fertilized. And within just nine short billion years...oops! I mean, nine months (sorry....) that egg EVOLVES from oocyte to embryo to fetus to infant.
So I believe in evolution, it works. Only thing, the egg from two human parents don't produce anything but another human. Don't you get it? It doesn't evolve into another life form.
Ohh. And as far as reduplicating prehistoric atmosphere? What does Miller know? Did he happen to know there was an ICE CANOPY around the Earth? (That's right the canopy was solid ice around the Earth until it was converted into rain at the time of the flood.) So whatever he was doing it was totally inaccurate. I can confirm that for you from here!
CASE DISMISSED!
Oh. And by the way. The "theory of relatively" is definitely wrong in case you were wondering. TIME has absolutely NOTHING to do with the mechanics of the physical universe. Time is simply an abstract concept, not a physiological principle.
Now let me explain to you what happened. When we see objects going at fast speeds at a distance, we perceive that they are moving somewhat slow, like a jet plane coursing across the sky. But we know that that plane is going much faster than it seems. Still the optical illusion transfers to our thinking that everything on that plane is also going in slow motion, thus develops the theory of relatively and time travel and all that. An optical illusion gone bad. When in fact, things are the same everywhere at any given second in time. Running in circles no matter how fast changes nothing as far as going forward or back into time.
Sorry you were impressed with two WRONG theories.
What you scientists need to learn is that there is more to the universe than simply what is perceptible physically. There's beyond science. There is perception of ART and, of course, the spiritual world. Things that exist that science can only demosntrate its limited understanding of.
Cheers,
Bibleman