Posted by Is it really im [Bibleman] on November 26, 1999 at 08:28:56 {2lTH7z2znEMSSTtTA17sslyACFuF8c}:
Let me just say I'm posting this just so the delusional parnoia of this issue doesn't get out of hand.
FIRST, THE LEGAL ISSUE: SCREEN NAME VIOLATIONS:
This has been brought up but it has nothing to do with this situation. Why? Because everybody knows it was "ros" who posted these messages, right? So where's the violation? There is none.
So for the record, I'd like to say that the FPP policy limits each individual to two screen names each and everybody knows my two screen names: "Bibleman" and "Joshua1992". So I have only used one of these names when posting here at H20 and have been compliant with this rule since its inception.
So that addresses the "rules" issues for H20.
IDENTITY OF "GB":
If you want to know who "GB" you should ask the person who posted his messages, ROS. Not me. But just for the record, I'm NOT "GB". (Got that Farkel-brain?)
See how easy that was?
WHAT ABOUT BANNING BIBLEMAN FOR LIFE?
Farkel-spokes has suggested that Bibleman be banned from H20 for life if he is "GB". I think that is ridiculous. In a situation like this, there should first be a notice, then a warning, then if a person continues and persists after about three warnings, then they should be suspended for three days. Then if they continue and persist then should be suspended for a month. Then after that, after closely working with the moderators to resolve the issue if it persists, then a ban for six months should be considered.
Every infraction deserves a warning and a chance for a person to correct their behavior before any punishment ensues.
That's my opinion.
Cheers,
Professor Bibleman