Posted by DaJahVeu [DaJahVeu] on November 25, 1999 at 10:45:48 {yaNwUlwC5cZREPDAWGQ2oEhE92Gn1k}:
In Reply to: ***Evolution Test posted by ros on November 25, 1999 at 09:22:17:
Ros, I could never agree with you more. That was well stated.
The crux, the heart of the matter, the very essence of what some, not all, "Scientist" want you to accept is the change of a species from one form to another. That's it, plain and simply put, no long convoluted theories, just accept this one little dogma and evolution is in your pocket. Kinda like accepting the Watchtower as God's sole channel of truth! Well, a strict examination of this, or even a surface examination of this theory, as I have purported here, shows serious flaws. Have you ever been introduced to how a magician's trick works, and once you see how simple it is, you wonder why no one else sees it? Then, you can see how the smoke screen well hides the trick? Well, evolution of species change from one form to another is the same way. When you ask for proof of this ONE issue, then is when you see how the trick works. You then see all the smoke screens of charts and graphs, names like "Peeking Man", "Homo erectus", etc..........The basic premise is all things reproduce after their own kind. Always have. Always will.
I don't mean to sound as though I'm belittling anyone, I was attacked on this issue I didn't start it; but you read these threads and you'll see their weak proof smoke screens, and even character attacks when they are faced with proving this one minute detail.
And, think too, a man not only had to evolve from a lower life form, so did his mate, and all other life forms as we know them.