# *Blood Transfusion

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Nicodemus [Nicodemus] on November 23, 1999 at 08:06:11 {KNpNN6QGfwmL9KjZpLewbTrVtUivFs}:

In Reply to: Blood Transfusion posted by Friend on November 22, 1999 at 12:33:38:

Friend,

Bravo, bravo, bravo!

What a truly fine piece of work! I have a lot I could say, but I'll keep it brief.

Your arguments were kind, and loving. I believe they represented the finest spirit of the teachings and example of our Lord Jesus Christ, which, in turn, we believe, are representative of his, and our, heavenly Father.

They were postive, not negative. Constructive, as opposed to destructive. Uplifting and ennobling, instead of downgrading and demeaning.

Best of all, I felt they responded accurately to the present, existing situation among Jehovah's Witnesses. They showed respect for those who were involved in the formulation of present policy. They showed respect for those among us who might like the way things currently are, and would be happy with the status quo. And yet, you offered another way; one in which respect could be shown for God's Law, while reaching a different conclusion than that we currently hold.

You demeaned no one, but rather uplifted and encouraged everyone.

My hat is off to you.

Your Brother,

Nicodemus

Follow Ups:

- **Blood Transfusion Friend 17:25:17 11/23/99 (2)
  - ***Blood Transfusion Nicodemus 13:32:28 11/24/99 (1)
    - ****Blood Transfusion Friend 15:50:10 11/24/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **Blood Transfusion

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]