Posted by Please explain [Lobo] on November 17, 1999 at 12:13:30 {xx2d.1sWpQFFDDTJfGM.60q8BzTBA6}:
In Reply to: **Concerns about AF, Part 1 posted by AP on November 17, 1999 at 08:55:48:
AP wrote:
I will not be replying to any follow-up posts, except for AF's, if he apologizes
Would you like to explain why you responded to Beaver? I don't understand your definition of follow-up posts
AP wrote:
you could not possibly have read through all three posts.
Do you know for a fact that Beaver cannot read 3 posts in 20 minutes? Last night I read a 40-page chapter in 15 minutes before an oral exam, and I passed. I'm sure that reading familiar arguments does not require longer than 20 minutes, or does it?
Lobo