*Concerns about AF, Part 1


[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Farkel [Keflar] on November 17, 1999 at 09:03:48 {xx2d.1sWpQjc7.1TE24IvhKqcjatLo}:

In Reply to: Concerns about AF, Part 1 posted by AP on November 17, 1999 at 08:26:06:

AP,

Talk about an act of desperation!

I've summarized you Part 1 windbagging for less patient readers:

>Below I will address more of AF’s personal attacks, lies and misrepresentations.

>His arguments are fallacious, one-sided and just plain bad in many respects, and he has been dishonest and misleading

>unless he apologizes for lying and for spreading lies.

>I am not going to go any further with a dishonest person who only gives out bad arguments, anyway

>It is a truly pathetic display of apologetics

>Here is where, if I were you, I would launch a wave of personal attacks against for being an utter idiot on such simple matters, let alone the more complicated ones.

>So, regardless of the arrogance and further dishonest handling of Friend’s position by AF,

>But your hypocrisy is duly noted.

>Of course, I have several times reposted examples of your misquotes and false analogies

>You have spread lies and falsehoods about me, and all you keep trying to do is justify yourself.

Farkel, shaking his head in amazement





Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **Concerns about AF, Part 1

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]