Posted by Bibleman [Bibleman] on November 16, 1999 at 18:44:42 {pRztWiaeukMSSTtTA17sslyACFuF8c}:
In Reply to: ***Identifying AntiChrist posted by honhea on November 16, 1999 at 14:55:29:
Hello Honhea,
As I've noted before, no matter what you say, there is going to be a Michael, Archangel alternative. It's just that flexible.
No matter what I say, I know the false trinity
doctrine will prevail in the minds of some people.
And this was prophesied. Christendom, who is
represented by the 666-BEAST has a name based
upon the Trinity doctrine. You know:
God+God+God
6+6+6
So I wouldn't hope to overturn a doctrine which is the chief false doctrine of the Anti-Christ.
So it is a matter of interpretation. And since people speak in euphemisms, and allegory and idiomatics, many interpretations are possible when you isolate scriptures. It's when you combine them all together is when the possible interpretations are dwindled down.
1 Thessalonians 4:16 says that Jesus has the voice of an archangel. That one scripture eliminates any other doctrines to the contrary.
So I know if you want to believe the trinity I won't be able to convince you otherwise since this is the main doctrine of the AntiChrist, the 666-BEAST. And for some reason, just the nature of the scriptures or even the nature of the relationship of Jesus and Jehovah and the holy spirit would cause this false doctrine to be maintained by the 666-Trinity Beast. So you have proven it is just very difficult to completely overturn this doctrine based upon scripture interpretation.
So, there you have it.
People are always going to have their own interpretation. And that includes me. So all I try to do is to make sure what I believe is in harmony with the entire Biblical text.
So far, so good.
Cheers,
Bibleman