# *Concerns about AF, Part 3

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Déjà Vu [Lobo] on November 17, 1999 at 11:35:35 {xx2d.1sWpQFFDDTJfGM.60q8BzTBA6}:

In Reply to: Concerns about AF, Part 3 posted by AP on November 17, 1999 at 08:28:48:

It seems that GS uses the same style of arguing over and over again.
When he argued (and lost?) with Don Hartley, GS used the same obfuscation and personal attacks:

The fact is Hartley is the one who characterized my forthcoming reply when he had not even read it! That is not an open-minded person, is it?
How is it that you so badly misconstrue what I have said on this matter? It seems that a highly defensive mindset can be the only cause for such thinking.
What Hartley apparently has not gathered from my replies is that my objection involves his non-sensical rejection of the context in determine the proper lexemic tagging for a particular term
Again, the problem is your apparent inability to recognize the objection, even after reflecting on the matter some six months.
Hartley, your act is getting tired, fast.
Apparently, as you yourself admit, it is indeed beyond you. Let me help you try and understand the problem you have here.

Lobo
who likes the fun that GS brings to this board

Disclaimer: Please all the above quotes are partial quotes. Before you make any final judgment on the writing style of GS, you should read his l-o-o-o-n-g replies at Don Hartley,

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **Concerns about AF, Part 3

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]