Posted by proplog2 [proplog2] on November 16, 1999 at 06:27:23 {pRztWiaeuk/CPYT8orz2lJ4aSwVkqg}:
In Reply to: ***Final Post -- Maybe posted by OneGlove on November 16, 1999 at 05:37:45:
Your whole response violates the Sufficent Grounds criterion for good argumentation.
At best you have grounds to express doubts about GB. But you have nothing to justify your accusations against ROS.
If you were a lawyer your fabrication would be thrown out in a Judge Judy minute.