Posted by COMF [COMF] on November 14, 1999 at 23:38:25 {fiuUEQ5dxU8btmTRbiCQoRa3VCcycQ}:
In Reply to: **Friend's Question posted by AP on November 14, 1999 at 17:24:53:
after I am done with AF.
You're not ever going to be "done" with AF.
Listen, Apok, even if it was possible to prove him wrong in all his assertions, that still would not undo the damage of Stafford's posting fiasco and his subsequent tap-dance all around acceptance of responsibility for the wrong-doing. This obsessive focus on AF is not going to clear the Stafford name or restore any semblance of respectability to him. It only makes clear that Greg Stafford doesn't want to focus on issues, and would rather instead stir up a huge obscuring cloud of dust attempting to use the "best defense is a good offense" method (but failing due to implementation flaws).
While the show occasionally has a spark of interest to it, as when Greg posted his embarrassing dodge around Cygnus' pointed question on the 1975 misquotation in Greg's book, it's dully predictable and not really worth the investment. Greg Stafford, as he has revealed himself on this board, is a transparent, egotistical loudmouth lacking knowledge of even the most basic principles of logic and debate. To read his posts is simply to watch a man coasting in a self-imposed downward spiral toward a crash.
COMF