# ****Final Post -- Maybe

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by proplog2 [proplog2] on November 16, 1999 at 06:27:23 {pRztWiaeuk/CPYT8orz2lJ4aSwVkqg}:

In Reply to: ***Final Post -- Maybe posted by OneGlove on November 16, 1999 at 05:37:45:

Your whole response violates the Sufficent Grounds criterion for good argumentation.

At best you have grounds to express doubts about GB. But you have nothing to justify your accusations against ROS.

If you were a lawyer your fabrication would be thrown out in a Judge Judy minute.

Follow Ups:

- *****Final Post -- Maybe OneGlove 06:34:41 11/16/99 (2)
  - ******Final Post -- Maybe proplog2 10:42:19 11/16/99 (1)
    - *******Final Post -- Maybe OneGlove 11:31:00 11/16/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: *****Final Post -- Maybe

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]