# **Final Post -- Maybe

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Amazing [Anointed] on November 16, 1999 at 10:28:01 {pRztWiaeuk/CPYT8orz2ASIIcexUto}:

In Reply to: *Final Post -- Maybe posted by OneGlove on November 15, 1999 at 19:44:25:

OneGlove: Let's examine your evidence.

1st Paragraph, you open by insulting our minds. That prepares us to really accept your theory.

2nd Paragraph, you think you see the evidence that Ros did this, but you are not sure, but it seems probable to you.

3rd Paragraph, GB deals exclusively with Ros, and that bothers you. Rebuttal: Reading GBs posts shows how that happened. He contacted beacon to talk privately, and Ros was the one who happened to answer. He wanted to control his security. Why would he go elsewhere?

4th Para., You are troubled by 'anonymity' as a defense on H20. Rebuttal: He said he went to Beacon and had no concept of what H20 was even about. He never used it as any defense for anything.

5th Para., You are troubled by writing style and similar phrases. Rebuttal: Go then and look at what Ray Franz and M733 wrote. Those too sound like Ros, or GB or several other here. She admitted up front that she was assisting him to disguise his writing style. Very plausible given that he did not fully know what he was getting into on H20 with the whole wrold reading his stuff.

6,7th para., Ros provides her opinion of Mr. GB and you then assign that to a description of herself. Rebuttal: That is not evidence, it is merely your speculation and conjecture.

8th Para., You acknowledge no malicity, but assign a hero complex. Rebuttal: That again is conjecture, and no evidence. You base that conjecture upon the previous conjecture.

9, 10, 11th Para., You point out how emotionally dependant people are being hurt by Ros' well intended saga. Rebuttal: This is not evidence, it is just pondering potential impact. Some have expressed enjoyment over this GB issue. The vast majority did not accept it. Again, conjecture, but absolutely no harm is in evidence.

12, 13th Para., Cautionary statement about use of H20 and comments about how reform may be viewed and dealt with. Rebuttal: You summation did not tie any evidence or conjecture to gether or show how the evidence persented could possibly lead to your conclusion that Ros is Mr. GB. Your summary is irrelvant.

Simply Amazing

Follow Ups:

- ***Final Post -- Maybe OneGlove 12:03:10 11/16/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: ***Final Post -- Maybe

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]