Posted by Shelby [Shelby] on November 11, 1999 at 23:14:29 {mJnjjpluA6qhSrsXV9ncG6V9RprRZs}:
In Reply to: *****For Friend From Fleeing posted by Friend crtn on November 11, 1999 at 21:13:00:
You said "I hold that the two have no relavancy toward one another.." Here is the difference, here is the explanation- I do. Why don't I see a different motivation as per your question to me? Because if I did I wouldn't come to the same conclusion as I have arrived at.
As I see it tho, now we can progress. I would think the proper interpretation would be the one that would satisfy the writings of all three reporters.
So my question to you has to be, do you feel your understanding of the 'signs' would satisfy the question asked in Mark, Luke as well as Matthew? Better yet does the answer given by Jesus answer the questions asked by Mark, Luke as well as Matthew? These are all accounts of the same event.
Hope you have time for this, but it's your call,
Shelby