Posted by Gedanken [Gedanken] on November 10, 1999 at 09:52:44 {AAJB0ph6mYHdgEG/iekYGxDfYXLgH2}:
In Reply to: "one and only one" posted by AP on November 09, 1999 at 20:10:30:
Greg,
Your second "Travis" post shed no light whatsoever on the situation. It is my opinion that it was a clear case of trying to save your skin since there was no other reason for you to make that second post. While you have apologized for those posts you have provided no satisfactory explanation as to why you posted them. Thus, my opinion is unchanged as to what your motivations were; deceit and subsequent damage control. Why do you continue to make an issue of things that should be highly embarassing to you? I read your second post almost immediately after it was posted; it made no sense nor did it ameliorate anything said in the first post. Friend has said the same thing. Whether Alan read it or didn't read is totally tangential. If it had been relevant he would have remembered it; it is as simple as that. You do have a way re-writing history, don't you. I forgot about it until you kindly reminded us all of its existence which, in turn, exposed more clearly how you tried to cover up your initial act of deceit.
It is obvious that you are intentionally latching on to irrelevant issues in a vain attempt to justify yourself thorugh distraction. It is very much like a child who is caught with his hand in the cookie jar telling Momma, "Momma, but Johnny scuffed his shoes on purpose and didn't tell you about it." That may or may not be true but it is irrelevant. One advantage of a real university education, as opposed to what you get at the world's premier Bible Institute (WWU-Theocratic Ministry School) is that you rapidly get disabused of the notion that such childish tactics will work in adult discussions.
Gedanken