Posted by Friend [Friend] on November 09, 1999 at 13:44:37 {4Hfg918T5gePXjHnUl.IOgnjR4Br/g}:
In Reply to: Censorship or Moderation? posted by Marquis on November 09, 1999 at 13:16:30:
Marquis
I challenge what you have said.
1) How do you reconcile that admitted JWs have been deleted?
2) How do you reconcile that lately moderatos have spent an inordinate amount of time dealing with two well self-proclaimed JWs.
3) How do you reconcile that postings from harsh critics of the Society have standing posts on this board right now?
4) How do you reconcile that H2O allows dissenting (but not bashing) voices, like yours, without deleting them?
5) Do you consider it fair that founders of H2O should have a policy for what they allow on this site? Do you consider that their prerogative our yours?
6) Do you think that people agreeing to that policy should then honestly keep that agreement?
That policy disallows the following:
“Posts that contain content or links in violation of international laws. Copyright material can only be quoted in accordance with "fair use" for educational purposes and of limited quantity; links can only be given to copyrighted material if the material legally exists at the linked location.”
Now if someone promises to abide by that statement of policy just what should they avoid? You tell us.
Contrary to your skewed view this site does much to help Jehovah’s Witnesses and those interested in Jehovah’s Witnesses. It does that by allowing open and free discussion within the boundaries of its participation policy. H2O allows consideration of views contrary to those of the Society. In fact it encourages consideration of all facets of Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Watchtower Bible & Tract Society and their beliefs and conduct.
The founders of this site probably have no idea of the real extent that this site is helping with issues that help is need on.
Friend