# ***********Apology

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Friend [Friend] on November 09, 1999 at 21:55:42 {4Hfg918T5ghxaL3hj3H2OgnjR4Br/g}:

In Reply to: **********Apology posted by COMF on November 09, 1999 at 21:43:39:

COMF

> In short, between us, what you are doing is demonstrating arrogance. Please take that as coming from a friend. (Proverbs 27:6) I am not your enemy.

> 5 million people think the WBTS is right about blood. Is it arrogant to disagree with them in public, and to state that their collective perception is wrong?

You need to learn how to read, COMF. I do not find AF’s replies to me on this thread arrogant because he disagrees with me. I find him arrogant because he hold his own views superior to contrary views when the issue is wholly subjective in the first place.

Let me phrase a question with some semblance of similarity:

Is it arrogant to hold one view superior to a second view regarding a wholly subjective issue and to make that known publicly when either view could be correct?

Yes.

Friend

Follow Ups:

- ************Apology COMF 21:58:28 11/09/99 (4)
  - *************Apology Friend 22:04:35 11/09/99 (3)
    - **************Apology COMF 22:13:37 11/09/99 (2)
      - ***************Apology YaYa 23:11:35 11/09/99 (0)
      - ***************Apology Friend 22:17:33 11/09/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: ************Apology

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]