# *"one and only one"

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Duncan [Duncan] on November 10, 1999 at 06:50:55 {AAJB0ph6mYbLo0EN31xk4uXMiiHhZQ}:

In Reply to: "one and only one" posted by AP on November 09, 1999 at 20:10:30:

I know this has been fully answered by AF already, but I wanted to put in my two cents.

Greg, this post is simply preposterous.

The gist of what you're arguing here is that AF on, one occasion, said "only aware of one post" and later said "didn't remember reading" the second. That's what this all boils down to.

By all the normal usages of language the two statements are entirely consistent, and taken together with his *lengthy* explanations are good enough - I would venture - to satisfy all reasonable readers.

But you wheel out your semantics-microscope, zero-in and attempt to show that there is a huge and fundamental difference in meaning and thereby "demolish" your man with these charges of lying, deception etc. etc.

Some here on H20 value the fact of your presence here as a scholarly and articulate defender of the WTS theology (even if we disagree with you) but you sometimes repay that support with the false coin of idiotic and personalised attacks on people over monumentally trivial and irrelevant issues.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **"one and only one"

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]