Posted by AF [AF] on November 07, 1999 at 05:45:06 {zExURjw8QA1EwaxRomAMdaOt1gg/Zk}:
In Reply to: ***TravisJ45 Post II? posted by Rick on November 07, 1999 at 00:57:16:
: ... The posts also no longer violate the FPP
What's wrong with you, Rick? I explained in great detail why the FPP was never violated by those posts, and in fact the FPP contains express language allowing for it!
Neither you nor ForumDirector1 has responded to those explanations or attempted to explain specifically why you think the FPP was violated. Nor have any of you tried to show why my proof that the FPP contained language allowing those posts is wrong.
AF