Posted by Julie [Julie] on November 06, 1999 at 19:12:15 {p8g/8h8r5QT.q0qzQJj2RyqclwWKXQ}:
In Reply to: **TravisJ45 Post II? posted by Adam Covington on November 06, 1999 at 17:12:12:
GS post II Alias explanation:
I decided to use another name for a JW participant, with which I could continue my discussion with AF
GS post I using Alias:
I honestly cannot see the point in continuing this debate. I recommend AF step out of the debate circle and let someone like COJ debate Greg about something like the gentile times chronology.
It is clear to me that the last thing Greg wants to do is to continue the debate with AF. It is also clear he thinks he could "take" COJ in a chronology debate and would rather do that.
GS post II Alias explanation:
having stood up for "Greg's" material, and thus drawing his attention to the "new kid" on the block.
GS post I using Alias:
But as far as this debate between Greg and AF goes Greg wins. To me AF's arguments are not that strong and he comes across a bit arrogant. I am not sure if I am more impressed with Greg's patience or his ability to argue.
*rofl*
"having stood up for "Greg's" material"?!? You gotta be kidding! That's quite an understatement. I have not seen such self glorification in a mighty long time. I wonder too about AF's arguments not being too strong. I mean if this were so I should think Greg would be able to calmly refute them point by point. Simple. He didn't do that though.
GS post II Alias explanation:
and thus drawing his attention to the "new kid" on the block.
Well it certainly drew a lot of attention. ;-) Too bad it backfired horribly. Maybe some actual attention *would* have been given to "the new kid on the block" if he had been able to resist praising himself so very highly. Also, had he been smart enough to register a SECOND TIME and get a DIFFERENT IDENTITY.
If this is the WT's greatest hope I can see why there would be great apprehension at Bethel.
Julie