# *Max/Admin cozy relations

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Julie [Julie] on November 07, 1999 at 08:05:22 {zExURjw8QAT.q0qzQJj2RyqclwWKXQ}:

In Reply to: Max/Admin cozy relations posted by J.H. on November 07, 1999 at 05:02:29:

Hi Jan, good to see you BTW....

Thanks for the summary. I really have only caught some of the whole debate/fiasco though I am sorry to have missed watching the fun.

Here's the bottom line for me and I was hoping Greg would address it in the thread below but alas, no.

In the original alias post he states that he sees no point in continuing the debate with AF. Then, in a different post as himself, he goes on to explain that he wanted the debate to continue but with him under an alias.

To me this looks like a lie. When you throw in the fact he named who and what he wanted to debate (it didn't include AF or their topic) it really makes it clear he does not want it to continue.

How can he claim otherwise? How can he feel he has any credibility? He has none with me and I am probably one of the less biased readers on the matter, having formed no opinion of him before this.

I don't understand how these claims of wanting to debate AF can be made with a straight face. Am I missing something? Help me out here.

Julie, who thinks maybe she is too simple minded to have remained Christian, not being wiley enough to defend such and not wanting to be.....

Follow Ups:

- **Max/Admin cozy relations Gedanken 12:10:24 11/07/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **Max/Admin cozy relations

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]