# **Vacillating

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Bibleman [Bibleman] on November 08, 1999 at 21:35:48 {Nq8EnQ8RVAMRXA6xmpscslyACFuF8c}:

In Reply to: *Vacillating posted by Cygnus on November 08, 1999 at 15:53:27:

Hello Cy,

How are you?

I'm on a new "campaign" to get the Reform Movement to write their own Revision Statement for the WTS now that they seem public relations conscious all of a sudden.

I thought some of the great writers here might just pop one out, but since you obviously are familiar with this, maybe you might consider coming up with one for us?

See my request link below. I hadn't realized you had an edge on the blood issue. But the above comments proves the Reform Policy is not establishing the clear Biblical bridges it needs. I'm going to pop one out but you certainly understand the focus. The article needs to be precisely what you have articulated, but in a "Questions from Readers" format.

Someone from our end needs to write it (we should have several!), we can't depend upon the WTS. Maybe you might consider one. Mine is going to be precisely focussed on your expressed sentiments here. Maybe you could consider providing a sample of how you think the revision should read?

Thanks, Cy.

See my request link to the post below. Have you seen the WTS' new "public relations" site. Be sure to check it out. Linked in recent post.

Cheers,
Bibleman

- Request for sample Blood Policy Revision Statement...

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: ***Vacillating

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]