# *Vacillating

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by metatron [metatron] on November 09, 1999 at 05:43:38 {4Hfg918T5gSCFBHEQNcwP/cA8RWhz2}:

In Reply to: Vacillating posted by Noggin on November 08, 1999 at 13:37:04:

blood is a sticky red fluid, it has no significance other than to act as a symbol of
life(biblically speaking).
Life is sacred, blood cannot be more sacred than
life, which it symbolizes. NO SYMBOL SHOULD BE
HELD AS MORE SACRED THAN THE THING IT SYMBOLIZES.

Additionally, there is ambiguity in the Bible
and even in the WTS publications about blood.
These include statements about simply being
unclean (in Leviticus), statements about a matter
of conscience (as with foods sacrificed to idols)
or Watchtower comments allowing blood fractions.

Since these statements exist, IT IS UNREASONABLE
TO DEMAND THAT ANYONE SACRIFICE THEIR LIFE ON THE
BASIS OF AMBIGUITY.
Further, It is apparent that WT. research on blood
is flawed - to this day, I have never seen them
admit that James gave his speech based on the
law of the alien resident in Lev. 17 - 19.

metatron

Follow Ups:

- **Vacillating Noggin 11:49:53 11/09/99 (1)
  - ***Vacillating metatron 13:10:32 11/09/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **Vacillating

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]