Posted by Friend [Friend] on November 03, 1999 at 15:48:55 {eZOTANvCI6hxaL3hj3H2OgnjR4Br/g}:
In Reply to: Let's Cut to the Chase posted by Moderator 1 on November 03, 1999 at 14:41:07:
Rick
Yes, let’s cut to the chase here.
Please explain why you believe Greg was ganged up on. Do you consider it ganging up that people were outraged by indecency?
I read those posts deleted with my own eyes. [GregStafford] posted under an alias claiming himself victorious in his debate with AF. I posted to it with wonderment myself. Frankly I was astounded at the apparent blunder of [GregStafford] but awaited some explanation. I was hoping for some reasonable explanation but got none. Instead what we got was something internally inconsistent, besides the fact that it did not come remotely close to explaining the victory declaration. Well [GregStafford] explained it all right. He admitted to having posted that message. If Greg’s own admissions are not enough then what is? If his admissions are enough then what do you expect from participants here?
We depend upon a measure of decency in this forum so that we can distinguish between serious posters and not so serious posters, between genuine efforts and disingenuous efforts. Well, I am sorry but [GregStafford] claiming victory for [GregStafford] is indecent and disingenuous. Kick me out if you must but it is true. Besides that I am offended that someone was willing to clean up behind him by deleting (hiding) his indiscretion. (Luke 8:17)
I am awaiting for what I think begs for a public explanation.
Friend