Posted by Moderator 1 [Rick] on November 03, 1999 at 14:16:35 {eZOTANvCI67ajbiu2wnkFMFBt36Xyc}:
In Reply to: *Last Post to H2O posted by JimboP666 on November 03, 1999 at 10:16:19:
> Well, I read your last post in the failed expectation that you might at least have apologized for your juvenile attempt to promote yourself by faking your identity and declaring yourself a winner.
I would like to see evidence of this accusation for those like myself who have not seen Greg "faking" his identity. The purpose of our requirement for posting evidence with accusations is because the alternative is for you to say, "Rick, I realize there are over 180,000 posts, but I'll have to ask you to read through every one of them (even if that takes you several years), to find the post(s) I'm referring to! I don't have time to dig it up."
That is why we require evidence to accompany a serious accusation, so that the requirement either (a) forces you to provide evidence with a serious accusation in same post, or (b) not post an accusation.
Failure to produce the evidence must lead any fair-minded individual to discount your serious accusation against Greg, and examine the FPP to see if there are any sanctions for violating it in this regard.
Rick