Posted by Greg Stafford [GregStafford] on November 03, 1999 at 07:36:33 {eZOTANvCI60hi4VK0MIQXxZ4XktaQ.}:
In Reply to: *Introduction posted by AF on November 02, 1999 at 23:09:06:
AF,
I think you had better get busy with your response, as what you wrote here does not qualify at all. It is a smoke screen, to be sure. As you wrote:
"I'll admit that my wording was poor, but it should be obvious that what I meant was this:"
OF COURSE you did not MEAN what you said, AF. I understand. Why would you now MEAN something you SAID when that something is now shown to be wrong? And we know you will certainly not extent this same courtesy to the Society, right?
I am sure we will find similar argumentation in your forthcoming reply, to which I look forward, with great eagerness.
Greg