Posted by mntzion [mntzion] on November 03, 1999 at 06:53:21 {eZOTANvCI6i1Us5iQnLw9dahiI6DLo}:
In Reply to: *I know posted by 7000 yrs on November 03, 1999 at 02:26:27:
Dear Bibleman,
The rationale of which you speak is so thin as to require a mental gymnist to accept it. To claim that it is "biblical" and describe it as you do is a stretch of gargantuan proportions, unless of course, there are corollary verses that would substantiate such a cockamamy interpretation.
IMHO mntzion