# *****AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!!

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by AF [AF] on November 05, 1999 at 21:34:58 {6xiCHW3gJ21EwaxRomAMdaOt1gg/Zk}:

In Reply to: ****AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! posted by Adam Covington on November 05, 1999 at 20:01:38:

You should note that, while Greg blew a lot of smoke, he did not quite deny anything about being involved with Schroeder. In fact, when I posed a number of specific questions that would have required simple yes-no answers, he answered none of them.

Furthermore, I now have the testimony of two independent sources that my statement was correct. Have you ever heard of "at the mouth of two witnesses let every matter be established"?

Additionally, via private email I have invited Greg to discuss these and certain private matters so as to "check with him" and find out what he might call "the truth of the matter". As of this writing he has not responded, and it has been two full days since I invited this dialog. Perhaps he's tied up with his PO, or perhaps he's "seeing to a matter".

AF

Follow Ups:

- ******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! Randall Watters 09:16:56 11/06/99 (0)
- ******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! AdamCovington 00:09:17 11/06/99 (2)
  - *******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! AF 01:58:46 11/06/99 (1)
    - ********AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! Julie 06:42:14 11/06/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: ******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!!

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]