# ****AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!!

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Adam Covington [AdamCovington] on November 05, 1999 at 20:01:38 {6xiCHW3gJ2/CPYT8orz2qRFwJ6xIkI}:

In Reply to: ***AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! posted by Gedanken on November 05, 1999 at 16:02:46:

Gedanken,

You said:

:In fact, he still continues to use every opportunity to call AF a liar:

Wouldnt you call AF a liar, since he purposely posted on a public thread information of which he could have easily confirmed with Greg, but didnt!

The facts remain that Greg has no relationship with Albert Schroeder, no matter what the supposed "informants" tell AF. If AF is not guilty of lies, he is at least guilty of spreading them!

AC

Follow Ups:

- *****AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! AF 21:34:58 11/05/99 (4)
  - ******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! Randall Watters 09:16:56 11/06/99 (0)
  - ******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! AdamCovington 00:09:17 11/06/99 (2)
    - *******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! AF 01:58:46 11/06/99 (1)
      - ********AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! Julie 06:42:14 11/06/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: *****AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!!

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]