# ******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!!

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by AdamCovington [AdamCovington] on November 06, 1999 at 00:09:17 {p8g/8h8r5Q/CPYT8orz2qRFwJ6xIkI}:

In Reply to: *****AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! posted by AF on November 05, 1999 at 21:34:58:

AF,

You said:

:You should note that, while Greg blew a lot of smoke, he did not quite deny anything about being involved with Schroeder.:

I believe the fact that he still believes your comments were lies, and stated as much in his e-mail with "barjonah" shows clearly that he feels that your post was inaccurate.

You said:
:In fact, when I posed a number of specific questions that would have required simple yes-no answers, he answered none of them.:

I believe he already clearly stated that your information was inaccurate. How many different ways to you want to hear it?

You said:

:Furthermore, I now have the testimony of two independent sources that my statement was correct. Have you ever heard of "at the mouth of two witnesses let every matter be established"?:

Would this include false witnesses? Like I have already stated how many different ways do you want to hear that this information is INACCURATE, before you finally accept that these "informants" have mislead you.

I know Greg personally, and have much of his research dating back to 1993. He openly criticized Ron Rhodes book since its release in 1993, writing several letters to him. In addition, I am aware of discussions on the radio between him and Robert Bowman as far back as 1993. I can assure you that he has NO PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH ALBERT SCHROEDER, as you seem to suggest. One has no other recourse to either refer to you as a liar, or one who spreads lies!

You said:

:Additionally, via private email I have invited Greg to discuss these and certain private matters so as to "check with him" and find out what he might call "the truth of the matter". As of this writing he has not responded, and it has been two full days since I invited this dialog. Perhaps he's tied up with his PO, or perhaps he's "seeing to a matter".:

He may very well be tied up at the moment. Who's to say he will contact you or not. Although it seemed to me that your invitation to "check with him" to get "the truth of the matter" is a bit late dont you think? Plus, this invitation seemed to be more spreading of rumors regarding his "fate" and that of "his friends at Elihubooks."

Alan, give it a rest, and apologize for the public spreading of false rumors!

AC

Follow Ups:

- *******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! AF 01:58:46 11/06/99 (1)
  - ********AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! Julie 06:42:14 11/06/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: *******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!!

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]