# *Challenge to GB Member Part II

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Farkel [Keflar] on November 03, 1999 at 13:37:05 {eZOTANvCI6jc7.1TE24IvhKqcjatLo}:

In Reply to: Challenge to GB Member Part II posted by M733 on November 03, 1999 at 12:16:02:

M733,

I had considered copying and sending "GB's" post to Ray myself, but you saved me the trouble. Thanks for doing that.

I have also stated in here that even today, Ray would welcome ANY GB member who was on his judicial committee into his home. GB has remained silent.

I'm convinced we won't be hearing from him again, or he will do something even more foolish and expose himself as not a member of the GB.

An alternative theory offered by AF is that Jaracz and/or his cronies caused the GB letters to be posted in order to precipitate a crisis and the inevetible and subsequent purge. Why? To further consolidate and entrench his power. I wouldn't put anything past Jaracz.

First a fake GB, and then a fake Greg Stafford defender. What's next?

Farkel, who doesn't like fakes

Follow Ups:

- **Challenge to GB Member Part II FRED HALL 14:04:57 11/03/99 (6)
  - ***Challenge to GB Member Part II Shamrock 20:20:33 11/03/99 (0)
  - ***Challenge to GB Member Part II Farkel 14:11:02 11/03/99 (4)
    - ****Challenge to GB Member Part II FRED HALL 14:25:02 11/03/99 (3)
      - *****Challenge to GB Member Part II Shamrock 21:09:38 11/04/99 (0)
      - *****Challenge to GB Member Part II ROFLMAO 14:48:38 11/03/99 (0)
      - *****Challenge to GB Member Part II SpudMama 14:32:11 11/03/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **Challenge to GB Member Part II

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]