# *******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!!

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by AF [AF] on November 06, 1999 at 01:58:46 {p8g/8h8r5Q1EwaxRomAMdaOt1gg/Zk}:

In Reply to: ******AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! posted by AdamCovington on November 06, 1999 at 00:09:17:

If Greg decides to speak with me personally about my sources and convinces me that they're wrong, then I'll change my mind and publicly apologize. Otherwise, because my sources have proved completely reliable in the past, and Greg has been caught in a direct lie here on H2O, and has demonstrably stretched the truth beyond the breaking point in his book chapter on "JWs are not false prophets", I'll trust my sources over Greg's statements on H2O or in private email.

Also note that saying "it's all lies!" in response to a number of statements, some of which I know are true, gives me little confidence that Greg is telling the truth. Maybe he is, but why should I believe him? My sources have nothing to gain or lose by telling me these things, but Greg has a lot to lose by admitting them. And we've seen what Greg is capable of doing under pressure. Besides, what do you know of any relationship he might have with Schroeder?

AF

Follow Ups:

- ********AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!! Julie 06:42:14 11/06/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: ********AF-GREG DEBATE BACK ON!!!

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]