# ***Let's Cut to the Chase

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Friend [Friend] on November 03, 1999 at 16:31:26 {eZOTANvCI6hxaL3hj3H2OgnjR4Br/g}:

In Reply to: **Let's Cut to the Chase posted by barJonah on November 03, 1999 at 16:14:43:

barjonah

Yes, my initial response to "TravisJ45 [GregStafford]" was that of reasonable hesitation together with wonderment. In short I asked for an explanation. The explanation received was internally inconsistent and did not come even close to explaining what I saw, at least to my standards.

Let me ask you a few questions.

1) When a congregation elder/MS moves to another congregation does their appointment go with them?

No.

2) If the appointment letter came back without appointing the newly moved brother then what does he step down from?

Nothing. So, just what is Greg considering stepping down from?

3) Assuming that considerable inconsistency can be explained, how does any of that justify the victory declaration?

I does not come even close to explaining it. Perhaps the rest could be explained, but not that. It was indecent. I do think that Greg has some good motives but what happened here today is inexcusable.

What I saw today is really disheartening. And right now I just don’t need that.

Friend

Follow Ups:

- ****Let's Cut to the Chase Farkel 18:29:41 11/03/99 (1)
  - *****Let's Cut to the Chase 5GJW 19:00:55 11/03/99 (0)
- ****Let's Cut to the Chase barJonah 16:53:59 11/03/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: ****Let's Cut to the Chase

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]