Posted by Friend [Friend] on November 02, 1999 at 18:34:29 {.c1iAaocfMhxaL3hj3H2OgnjR4Br/g}:
In Reply to: ****Response to AF: Part One posted by Rational on November 02, 1999 at 18:13:21:
Rational
Yes, they can follow that thread and find questions asked and left unanswered that are basic to the issue. They will find that your "subset" theory is nonsensical. They will find the following questions germane and left unanswered by you.
The [Survivel book] writer felt it would be a serious mistake to apply the parable to any time later (or beyond) than when they then expected it to be completely fulfilled.Do you agree with that statement?
And: Irrespective of Armageddon, do you consider the great tribulation as part of "the conclusion of the system"? As of the great tribulation time would still be running out until the final event of Armageddon
Well, Friend, I've indulged you in at least two time-consuming threads where all you ended up doing was resorting to the kind of obfuscation and weaseling evident in the above thread.
You characterize comments as obfuscation when you do not understand an issue or details leading to that understanding. Rather then see it through to the end you quit. You run away from the issue. Weasel’s run away.
Even here you are attempting to weasel away from your own words! You accused that I frequently utilize ad hominem. Since you are willing to make the accusation then I was willing to ask and request:
Do you even know what ad hominem is? Please, show us all where I have used such a tactic!
Well, are you going to answer for yourself or not? Are you going to weasel away from your own accusation or not?
Friend