Posted by Rational [trw] on November 02, 1999 at 18:13:21 {.c1iAaocfMYgCUWv3.1cm0FN8UzOHE}:
In Reply to: ***Response to AF: Part One posted by Friend on November 02, 1999 at 17:16:29:
Anyone wishing an answer to your questions has only to follow this thread to its conclusion.
What's the old saying, "Fool me once, shame on you ... fool me twice, shame on me"? Well, Friend, I've indulged you in at least two time-consuming threads where all you ended up doing was resorting to the kind of obfuscation and weaseling evident in the above thread. I won't waste any more time trying to engage you in meaningful discussion. If AF or Gedanken or Nimrod, feel there's any point in it, that's their business ... but I've learned my lesson, especially after reading Greg Stafford's reply to AF and realizing how it reminded me of your own 'tactics'.
Rational