Posted by Alan [ABK] on November 01, 1999 at 07:08:56 {2gTL9dbN6kXAM4SutkNwcg1OR9dBW2}:
In Reply to: Q for apostates posted by B on October 31, 1999 at 18:09:04:
I'm not qualified to answer since I am not an apostate, but I will point out the flaw in your message.
: The reason for why I liked it so much
is, that they never had the answer.
So what if individuals don't know all of the answers, we don't expect them to.
:As I studied longer, my questions became more complicated. I asked them why they said the
tree in Daniel 4 meant god when the bible said it meant Nebukadnezzar,
Why would God give a prophecy like that about Nebuchadnezzar for the second fulfillement of it?
That's the answer and if you read the rest of it, it refers to God's kingdom.
:I asked them why John
1:1 was wrong and they said it was because he was a new god, so I naturally asked if that could
be right because then we would have to break the first commendment (sp?).
They are wrong. It is not a new god. Jesus was God's son as a heavenly spirit being.
Don't judge because they don't know. Study the Bible.