# *Q for apostates

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Alan [ABK] on November 01, 1999 at 07:08:56 {2gTL9dbN6kXAM4SutkNwcg1OR9dBW2}:

In Reply to: Q for apostates posted by B on October 31, 1999 at 18:09:04:

I'm not qualified to answer since I am not an apostate, but I will point out the flaw in your message.

: The reason for why I liked it so much
is, that they never had the answer.

So what if individuals don't know all of the answers, we don't expect them to.

:As I studied longer, my questions became more complicated. I asked them why they said the
tree in Daniel 4 meant god when the bible said it meant Nebukadnezzar,

Why would God give a prophecy like that about Nebuchadnezzar for the second fulfillement of it?

That's the answer and if you read the rest of it, it refers to God's kingdom.

:I asked them why John
1:1 was wrong and they said it was because he was a new god, so I naturally asked if that could
be right because then we would have to break the first commendment (sp?).

They are wrong. It is not a new god. Jesus was God's son as a heavenly spirit being.

Don't judge because they don't know. Study the Bible.

Follow Ups:

- **Q for apostates JulienSOrel 17:07:19 11/01/99 (0)
- **Q for apostates IBelieve 11:31:38 11/01/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **Q for apostates

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]