# ******Discussion summaries

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Friend [Friend] on November 01, 1999 at 11:21:38 {2gTL9dbN6kePXjHnUl.IOgnjR4Br/g}:

In Reply to: *****Discussion summaries posted by AF on November 01, 1999 at 10:51:09:

AF

> That's way too ambiguous because "has application" can mean just about anything.

I don’t believe you gave me an honest and straightforward answer. The paragraph in question uses the phrase “could not apply”. The positive expression is “has application.” For sake of our conversation I will rephrase the question. I would really like a straightforward answer this time.

In context of the Survival book, is the following your contention or not:

- Teaching that the Sheep/goat/judgment applies after today (today: right now not next year) is the supposed “serious mistake.”

  Is that your contention, yes or no?

  Please note that the “serious mistake” does not address when the application begins but rather the issue of after which its application would be in error. Please stop mudding the water.

  Friend

  Follow Ups:

  - *******Discussion summaries AF 14:33:16 11/01/99 (1)
    - ********Discussion summaries Friend 16:01:14 11/01/99 (0)
  - *******Discussion summaries Rational 12:21:31 11/01/99 (5)
    - ********Discussion summaries Friend 12:40:40 11/01/99 (4)
      - *********Discussion summaries Rational 14:54:58 11/01/99 (3)
        - **********Discussion summaries Friend 15:46:18 11/01/99 (2)
          - ***********Discussion summaries Rational 18:08:33 11/01/99 (1)
            - ************Discussion summaries Friend 19:02:07 11/01/99 (0)

  Post a Followup

  Name:
  E-Mail:

  Subject: *******Discussion summaries

  Comments:

  Optional Link URL:
  Link Title:
  Optional Image URL:

  [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]