# *For Lurking JWs

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Excellent --ros [ros] on November 01, 1999 at 01:14:51 {2gTL9dbN6kdmhhsMJ.h27/SY5I9NtE}:

In Reply to: For Lurking JWs posted by jimmyjames on October 31, 1999 at 23:13:58:

Good points, JJ.
I've thought the very same thing, that one of the biggest things on H2O that serves to discredit Witnesses here is letting some of the absurd things go by that the likes of ABK says about them and the WT's position. I refuse to even acknowledge him as a typical JW because he's definitely not. If I were a Witness, I'd be more worried about some of them bringing "reproach on Jehovah's Name" than any of the so-called "apostates."
We have plenty of legitimate arguments to expose the flawed Watchtower teachings without having to resort to crediting some of these as being typical representatives. They're just not.

Ros

Follow Ups:

- **For Lurking JWs WitnetObserver 07:17:44 11/01/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **For Lurking JWs

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]