# *Should WTS be destroyed

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by metatron [metatron] on October 28, 1999 at 05:29:46 {BrTq3yWfsYSCFBHEQNcwP/cA8RWhz2}:

In Reply to: Should WTS be destroyed posted by jimmyjames on October 27, 1999 at 23:13:10:

I think we've all meditated about this,
knowing some good people in the organization.
I used to think that a "soft landing " was the
desired goal, to protect sensitive people. None
of us want to think of ourselves as somehow
bringing weak people to commit suicide.
I'm now inclined to have less regard for a "soft
landing" approach because of the huge amount of
self-deception that the average witness is willing
to achieve. Even with massive exposure many will
say that it's just a test, that this means the
End is that much closer.
People will adapt to change, they'll have to,
because the world is going to "hit the
accelerator" with political and scientific changes
coming faster and faster.

In summary, bring it on.

metatron

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **Should WTS be destroyed

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]