# *JUST WHAT IF . . .?

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Julie [Julie] on October 27, 1999 at 15:10:40 {dPkPwxsNJET.q0qzQJj2RyqclwWKXQ}:

In Reply to: JUST WHAT IF . . .? posted by ros on October 26, 1999 at 12:24:48:

Hi Ros,

This scenario is a bit of a catch-22 for the R&F JW. I mean correct me if I'm wrong but haven't they always been instructed to never question "the slave"? I think they would be very hesitant to voice opinions on these matters. What if a JW claimed that yes, these would be positive changes and, from lack of support, the changes never took place. Than that JW has pretty much said the WT is wrong in current policy. That's a DF offense, isn't it (according to current standards)?

I know if I were in the mindset of having to watch my back because of my "loving brothers and sisters" I sure as heck wouldn't be too quick to voice opinion other than all is fine, I'm happy as can be.

Just a thought. Thanks for all you efforts on bringing this all to the board, this GB "event".

Take care,
Julie

Follow Ups:

- **JUST WHAT IF . . .? ros 20:47:04 10/27/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **JUST WHAT IF . . .?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]