Posted by Rick [Rick] on October 26, 1999 at 15:42:42 {c/rgKhj4Nc7ajbiu2wnkFMFBt36Xyc}:
In Reply to: ***Post #5 posted by Farkel on October 26, 1999 at 13:30:03:
Farkel, Farkel, Farkel! You misunderstood me. I said that if Kent expects the GB member to provide the said info, that the GB member has the right to know the reason why Kent wants it. Otherwise, Kent should get the info through the public channels himself. Which leads to the question, why ask the GB member for the info without even qualifying the request, if it's so easily available? ;-)
Rick
p.s. (sniff) Did someone just let out another farkel? ;-D