Posted by Excellent post [1] on October 26, 1999 at 10:54:31 {c/rgKhj4NcoLB7Y6H2dwO5mu/o1Vh.}:
In Reply to: **Letter to the WTS GB posted by U R Correct on October 26, 1999 at 08:33:15:
A major modification in this doctrine would make the JW organization
a kinder, gentler group with which to associate
the post is on the money , personally though the above is the only point i disagree with
i think a modification in the "We speak for god dogma" would destroy the wt , for it is the entire Super structure upon which it is built
to no longer know that when you read the lastest
"Time" or i meant WT mag that it has no more Holy Spirit on it than Bill Board mag is pretty depressing for someone who bought WT Stock and still has thier Week 53 to thier timeshare waiting to use it
to know that the CO or DO is no more than an Area Director who want's to keep the Quarterly earning up or
that FOOL of an elder in your hall is not really appointed by HS after all
which is what you thought the day they announced him from the platform as an elder anyway
i don't see how they could stand such a change in dogma therby making whatever they print, whatever letters the congo get the rank and file will now now that they are just the OPINION OF SOME DUDES IN NY
i recall so many elders meeting how the LETTER FROM THE SOCIETY was viewed in elders meeting
God's direction- then to realize your opinion is just as good aS that OF the Boys in writing's opinion
WOULD THERE STILL BE THOSE WHO WOULD FOLLOW THE gb EVEN IF THEY SaiD WE DON'T SPEAK FOR GOD
OF COURSE
history is filled with folks who despite Hel* or High Water still need someone to tell them when to Fart.
1