Posted by Janey [Janey123] on October 26, 1999 at 00:41:12 {c/rgKhj4NcQbFKOMxDIE02No4/XcIE}:
In Reply to: Legalism posted by N.H. on October 25, 1999 at 23:52:34:
... If animals can't have blood transfusions, or eat food with blood products in it, then I suppose it would by the same logic mean that they could also not mate (have sexual relations) because they have no marraige license. Makes anbout the same amount of sense to me...
... I think the Writing Committee got a little over-zealous on this one...
... Janey