|
Knowledge and Understanding of Work(s) (A) |
Response to The Prompt (B) |
Appreciation of Literary Features (C) |
Presentation (D) |
Formal Use of Language (E) |
|
Little knowledge of the work(s) used to answer the question |
The ideas are mainly insignificant and/or irrelevant. The essay consists mainly of paraphrase/narrat- ion/repetition of content. |
Little mention or consideration of the literary features of the works in relation to the question. |
Little evidence of a structure to the essay. Little attempt to present ideas in an ordered or logical sequence |
The use of language is not readily comprehensible. Many lapses in grammar, spelling, sentence construction (syntax). Vocabulary rarely accurate/appropriate |
|
Some knowledge of work(s) used to answer the question. Superficial understanding of the works. |
The ideas are sometimes irrelevant. The essay consists mainly of unsubstantial generalizations. |
Some consideration of the literary features of the works in relation to the question. Superficial analysis of the literary features mentioned. |
Some evidence of a structure to the essay. Some attempt to present ideas in an ordered or logical sequence |
Some degree of clarity and coherence in lang. Some degree of accuracy in: (g, s, s.c.). Vocab sometimes appropriate. |
|
Adequate understanding of the work(s) used to answer the question. Adequate and appropriate references to the work(s). |
The ideas are relevant. The analysis of the ideas is adequate and appropriately illustrated by some relevant examples. |
Adequate analysis of the literary features of the works in relation to the question. The analysis is appropriately illustrated by relevant examples. |
Adequate structure to the essay. Ideas are generally presented in an ordered or logical sequence. Supporting examples are sometimes appropriately integrated. |
Adequately clear and coherent use of language. Only a few significant lapses in :(g, s, s.c.). Some care shown in choice of vocab. Register generally appropriate. |
|
Good understanding of the work(s) used to answer the question as well as some subtleties of their meaning. Detailed and pertinent references to the work(s). |
The ideas are carefully explored and include a considered personal response. The analysis of the ideas is generally detailed and appropriately illustrated by relevant examples. |
Detailed and pertinent analysis of the literary features of the works used in response to the question. The analysis is well illustrated by carefully chosen examples. |
Clear and logical structure to the essay. Supporting examples are appropriately integrated into the body of the essay. |
Clear, varied and precise use of language. No significant lapses in: (g, s, s.c.). Effective and appropriately varied use of vocab., idiom and style. Suitable choice of register. |
|
Perceptive understanding of the work(s) used to answer the question as well as some subtleties of their meaning. Detailed and persuasive references to the work(s). |
The ideas are convincing and show independence of thought. The analysis of the ideas is consistently detailed and persuasively illustrated by carefully chosen examples. |
Critical analysis of the literary features of the works used in relation to the question. The analysis is consistently well illustrated by persuasive examples |
Purposeful and effective structure to the essay. Supporting examples are well integrated into the body of the essay. |
Clear, varied, precise and concise use of language. No significant lapses in: (g, s, s.c.). Precise use of wide vocabulary, and varied idiom and style. Effective choice of register. |