|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
|
Understanding of the text(s) |
Interpretation of the Text |
Appreciation of Literary Features |
Presentation |
Formal Use of Language |
|
Little understanding of thought and feeling expressed in the text(s). Irrelevant or inappropriate references to the text(s) and secondary sources. |
The ideas are mainly insignificant and/or irrelevant. The analysis consists mainly of paraphrase/narration/ repetition of content. |
Little mention or consideration of the literary features of the text. |
Little evidence of a structure to the commentary. Little attempt to present ideas in an ordered or logical sequence. |
The use of language is not readily comprehensible. Many lapses in grammar, spelling, sentence construction (syntax). Vocabulary rarely accurate/appropriate |
|
Superficial understanding of thought and feeling expressed in the text(s). Some relevant references to the text(s) and secondary sources. |
The ideas are sometimes irrelevant. The essay consists mainly of unsubstantial generalizations. |
Some consideration of the literary features of the works in relation to the question. Superficial analysis of the literary features mentioned. |
Some evidence of a structure to the essay. Some attempt to present ideas in an ordered or logical sequence |
Some degree of clarity and coherence in lang. Some degree of accuracy in: (g, s, s.c.). Vocab sometimes appropriate. |
|
Adequate understanding of thought and feeling expressed in the text(s). Adequate and appropriate references to the text(s) and secondary sources. |
The ideas are relevant. The analysis of the ideas is adequate and appropriately illustrated by some relevant examples. |
Adequate analysis of the literary features of the works in relation to the question. The analysis is appropriately illustrated by relevant examples. |
Adequate structure to the essay. Ideas are generally presented in an ordered or logical sequence. Supporting examples are sometimes appropriately integrated. |
Adequately clear and coherent use of language. Only a few significant lapses in: (g, s, s.c.). Some care shown in choice of vocab. Register generally appropriate. |
|
Good understanding of thought and feeling expressed in the text(s) as well as some subtleties of their meaning. Detailed and pertinent references to the text(s) and secondary sources. |
The ideas are carefully explored and include a considered personal response. The analysis of the ideas is generally detailed and appropriately illustrated by relevant examples. |
Detailed and pertinent analysis of the literary features of the works used in response to the question. The analysis is well illustrated by carefully chosen examples. |
Clear and logical structure to the essay. Supporting examples are appropriately integrated into the body of the essay. |
Clear, varied and precise use of language. No significant lapses in: (g, s, s.c.). Effective and appropriately varied use of vocab., idiom and style. Suitable choice of register. |
|
Perceptive understanding of thought and feeling expressed in the text(s) as well as some subtleties of their meaning. Detailed and persuasive references to the text(s) and secondary sources. |
The ideas are convincing and show independence of thought. The analysis of the ideas is consistently detailed and persuasively illustrated by carefully chosen examples. |
Critical analysis of the literary features of the works used in relation to the question. The analysis is consistently well illustrated by persuasive examples |
Purposeful and effective structure to the essay. Supporting examples are well integrated into the body of the essay. |
Clear, varied, precise and concise use of language. No significant lapses in: (g, s, s.c.). Precise use of wide vocabulary, and varied idiom and style. Effective choice of register. |