To
sign this, please send an email to Larry Dupuis, [email protected]
May 4, 2002
Emily
Koczela Ruth
Treisman
School
Board President Shorewood
School Board
4259
N. Larkin 2701
E. Beverly
Shorewood,
WI 53211 Shorewood,
WI 53211
Nancy
Borenstein Paul
Zovic
Shorewood
School Board Shorewood
School Board
3536
N. Frederick 2504
E. Newton
Shorewood,
WI 53211 Shorewood,
WI 53211
Mark
Freding John
Linehan
Shorewood
School Board Shorewood
School District Superintendent
4132
N. Maryland 1701
E. Capitol Dr.
Shorewood,
WI 53211 Shorewood,
WI 53211
Richard
Munroe
Principal,
Shorewood High School
1701
E. Capitol Dr.
Shorewood,
WI 53211
To
the Board and Administrators of the Shorewood School District:
As residents of Shorewood, parents
of Shorewood students, and/or alumni of Shorewood schools, we were dismayed to
learn that the School District was presenting William Rehnquist, Chief Justice
of the U.S. Supreme Court, with its first “Tradition of Excellence” award on
May 24, 2002.
To be sure, Justice Rehnquist is among Shorewood
High School’s most prominent and powerful alumni. Indeed, he has attained the highest position in the legal
profession.
Prominence, power and career achievement, however,
are not synonymous with “excellence,” which the District’s award purports to
recognize. Joseph McCarthy was one of
the most prominent and powerful Wisconsinites of the past century, but I would
hope that, if McCarthy had graduated from the Shorewood Schools, the district
would refrain from honoring so controversial a figure. While not as notorious as McCarthy’s,
Rehnquist’s record is profoundly troubling.
As a lawyer and jurist, Justice
Rehnquist has repeatedly fought against the advancement of civil rights and
individual liberties. As a law clerk to
Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson during deliberations on Brown v. Board
of Education, Rehnquist wrote a memorandum urging the Justice to vote to
uphold the “separate-but-equal” doctrine that was the foundation of nearly a
century of racial apartheid in the United States. Fortunately, Justice Jackson rejected Rehnquist’s benighted
views, and all our public schools, including Shorewood’s, provide a more open
and diverse educational environment as a result.
Later, as a lawyer in Arizona,
Rehnquist was active in a right-wing organization that attempted to deter
minorities from voting and opposed a local ordinance allowing blacks to enter
stores and restaurants. As a lawyer in
the Nixon administration, he argued that the government should be permitted to
place a wiretap on anyone the president deemed a “threat to national security.”
As a Supreme Court Justice,
Rehnquist has been more subtle in his methods and rhetoric, but the effects of
his rulings continue to constrict civil rights and individual liberties. In the name of “state’s rights” and
“federalism” (principles that were conveniently set aside when the Court
interfered with Florida’s electoral process during the 2000 election fiasco),
Justice Rehnquist and his conservative colleagues have severely undermined
federal anti-discrimination law. At the
same time, they have turned the post-slavery “equal protection” clause of the
Constitution on its head, using it to prevent universities and other
institutions from correcting the effects of centuries of slavery and
discrimination by opening doors to racial minorities.
Among the events scheduled in conjunction with the
tradition of excellence award is a student assembly, at which Justice
Rehnquist’s high school days and career achievements will be recalled and
celebrated.
The mission of the schools is to teach children to
be critical and independent thinkers and engaged citizens. It is antithetical to that mission to
present Justice Rehnquist’s career uncritically or to gloss over controversy
about his positions.
We ask that the District take the opportunity
occasioned by Justice Rehnquist’s visit to educate students about the role of
the Supreme Court in our society, the principal philosophical and legal
perspectives behind the debates now before the Court, and the real-world
consequences these competing judicial philosophies have had. Such a program will equip students to make
an informed judgment about the merits of Justice Rehnquist’s career for
themselves. We propose a program for
the high school students, during a school day some time before the award is
presented. We are open with regard to
format and timing, but would like to ensure that it is as accessible to as many
students as possible and that representatives of local civil rights and civil
liberties groups be involved in the presentation.
The possibility of holding such a program has been
raised on more than one prior occasion with school administrators and in a
previous letter to the board. We ask that
you please respond to Larry Dupuis by phone at 332-5468 (evenings) or by e-mail at [email protected], as soon as
possible, so that arrangements can be made prior to Justice Rehnquist’s visit.
Sincerely,