Julia
Schwartz
May 26, 2003
The technical definition of Truman Capote’s account In
Cold Blood
is that of “creative nonfiction,” but the meaning of this is rather
abstract. It seems more likely that Capote’s book is more an argument against
the death penalty with one massive example extending through the entire piece:
the focus – the Clutter murder by Perry Smith and Dick Hickock. Capote’s
presentation of the story clearly shows his bias, tainting the credibility of
his account of the murder and decreasing the authenticity of his genre while
bringing into question the true meaning of the title, “In Cold Blood.”
In Cold
Blood is
largely set up as a written documentary, whose calling it does serve as a
recount of the Clutter murder case. However, Capote’s larger purpose in
telling the story seems to be more to argue against the death penalty, and the
documentary style serves this purpose as well, for the reader isn’t aware of
what is happening to her psyche, instead merely focusing on the story as a
story, and not as a reality – where her opinions might change with the
realization of the impact of the murders.
A striking attribute of In
Cold Blood
is that the main focus is not on the murder victims, the Clutters, or even the
investigative work – the detective story – but on the murderers, Dick and
Perry, and the inner workings of their minds. In introducing the souls of Dick
and Perry to the readers, especially that of Perry, Capote illustrates the
killers not as killers, but as human beings with sensitive sides, fears, dreams,
and desires, who simply made a mistake – forgetting that that mistake ended
four innocent lives. To help the readers forget the impact of Dick and Perry’s
crime, there is a significant lack of focus on the Clutters themselves – each
is afforded only a few short descriptions, and then a brief explanation of how
he or she met his or her end at the hands of Perry (or Dick). In having less
focus on the Clutters, they become less of a reality to us, and we as readers
feel little emotional connection with them, while we feel an intense
relationship with Perry and even Dick. This thus makes the murders less
impersonal, and we fail to connect Perry and Dick’s crime with the actual ends
of the lives of the Clutters – four lives to be lived no longer, for no reason
but for forty dollars. When we forget about the impact of the crime, it becomes
much easier to feel sorry for Dick and Perry – thus aiding Capote in his
crusade against the death penalty.
The same situation holds true in the movie depiction of In
Cold Blood,
an argument based on Capote’s book and just as emphatic, but perhaps more
effective than the book, for it grants viewers a visual representation of Dick
and Perry, allowing us another glimpse into their reality. The movie presents
the viewer with complete pity for Perry and Dick, because they seem like such
amiable people, and because the Clutters seem altogether unrealistic as human
beings – Nancy Clutter wouldn’t have walked into the room with the killers
as calm as could be in the middle of the night; instead, she most likely would
have panicked and hidden or run away. Though the movie presents Perry as the
literal killer of all four Clutters (he references Dick as the witness to the
crime, which wouldn’t have been the case if Dick had committed some of the
murders), and the book is somewhat ambiguous on the topic, the movie presents
just as much of a bias toward Perry as Capote’s book did. Dick is more
personable in the movie, but his death is hardly depicted, and thus believed to
the same extent as the Clutters: not much. Perry’s, however, is shown, with
extensive coverage of the time before it, causing the viewer to feel the
tremendous weight of impending death.
The
result of the movie portrayal of Perry, then, is the loss of the memory of the
atrocities he was responsible for, and the weight of his death alone – and the
pivotal attribute of the argument against capital punishment. The scenes
connecting Perry with the murders show him talking with Nancy Clutter and making
the victims-to-be comfortable in bizarre ways, never actually hurting them. This
is partially a product of the time in which the film was recorded, but even
today, that information would have most likely been left out of the movie
because it significantly weakens the argument that the movie, along with Capote,
is making against the death penalty. In his death, we see Perry as completely
helpless: shackled, scared, sweating or crying (or just concerned with the
reflection of the rain on the windows upon his face), and ultimately, his heart
stopping beating. Before his death, Perry pleads with his captors – those who
are monitoring his final moments – for a chance to go to the bathroom, to save
whatever is left of his dignity. His death is portrayed as an altogether
inhumane experience, more so than the murders he committed, actually. The
spectators watching the execution seem barbaric, standing by and just watching a
man’s life end, and Perry’s helplessness upon the gallows culminates when
his heart stops beating and the screen goes blank but for the three words “in
cold blood” – the title of the movie, yes, but to which murders this refers
is left somewhat unclear. Is it the murders of the Clutters, the first thought,
or is it the executions of Dick and Perry, who had as little defense against
their killers as Herb, Bonnie, Nancy, and Kenyon?
As “creative fiction,” then, Capote’s book is a little deficient, as it is in no way primarily objective, instead the front for his argument against the death penalty, an argument, which, along with the movie form of the book, is ultimately effective in many cases in persuading the viewer against the death penalty as a form of capital punishment. By dehumanizing the victims of the Clutter murder and disconnecting the ramifications of murder with their fates, and bringing the readers close to Dick and especially to Perry, the reader ultimately feels almost sorrier for Dick and Perry than she does for the murder victims, a scenario altogether shameful. It is, then, up to the reader to determine who the ultimate victims of the Clutter case were: the Clutters, or Perry and Dick.