Article: Attack on U.S. Soil: No Easy Retaliation


As the Bush administration pauses tonight to assess the situation in the wake of the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, it faces a tremendous dilemma. A massive and deliberate act of war was carried out Sept. 11 at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. But unlike the attack on Pearl Harbor, which was repeatedly raised as a precedent for today's attacks, the United States was not attacked by an identifiable political entity. Although the administration has no choice but to go to war, it has no one yet to declare war against.

Those directly responsible for the attacks died in the act. They cannot be targeted. But defining an enemy beyond the hijackers takes the United States into a conceptual swamp. Washington could choose to target Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden, but he is only one actor in an amorphous and transnational religious political movement.

The United States can hardly declare war on militant Islam without targeting or destabilizing countries with which it needs to remain on good terms. Moreover, launching such a campaign opens the United States up to further acts of terrorism. Before directly challenging militant Islam, Washington must either determine what terrorist assets remain in the country, neutralize them, and seal the borders, or it must settle into a state of domestic siege. If militant Islam is declared the enemy, how could the United States achieve or even define victory?

U.S. President George W. Bush faces a dilemma. To react slowly risks painting him as weak and indecisive. But there are no quick or easy targets.

Thanks to:

(c) Strategic Forecasting L.L.C. All rights reserved.

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1