Summary
600 years ago, Copernicus helped change the world by proposing
that astronomers change their viewpoint. 40 years ago, Wiener suggested
an alternative way of looking at human behavior. Copernicus did not change
reality, he only helped us change our viewpoint of it. But that change
of viewpoint lead to modern physics, modern science and our modern world.
Cybernetic feedback theory has created a "scientific revolution" in the
philosophy of science. It has reintroduced the concept of a final cause
or teleology as a legitimate scientific explanation. It has not changed
reality, only our viewpoint of it. This is creating ripple effects in a
number of scientific disciplines. Specifically, it is reintroducing the
concept of purpose in human behavior as a legitimate concept. It does this
by integrating time in a behavioral act through the concept of feedback.
This shifts the determinism of behavior from the environment to the individual.
Basically cybernetic feedback theory sees the individual as a
selforganizing feedback control system which generates its own activity
in order to control its own perceptions. In terms of motor activities,
this means that the individual has its own perceptual mappings which are
used to guide the activities of the individual through a feedback testing
of the perceptual realities with the perceptual mappings already existing
in the brain. Applying the principle of feedback to language usage, we
discover that speaking as an overt public behavior is controlled by an
a priori internally private listening capacity. With listening capacity,
the transfer to the public performance of speaking, though not automatic
is highly enhanced. Without that listening capacity, spontaneous speech,
internally generated does not occur.
The practical effects of shifting one's viewpoint to the cybernetic
feedback position are significant. In the prior position, which focused
upon behavior as an indicator of learning, the teacher must push the student
to perform publicly. The student's behavior is controlled by the teacher's
control of the environment. This approach emphasizes speaking by the student
so that the teacher can judge the students learning progress. The teacher
then provides the student with the feedback of whether his speech was correct
or not. The teacher is the judge of good speaking, not the student.
The new viewpoint sees the internal language structure pulling
out the performance based upon built-in expectancies within the language
structure learned through listening guidance. This is done by the student
when he feels ready. The student is in control of his own behavior. The
student like a rope is more easily pulled, than pushed. Since the speech
is controlled by listening feedback, the student is the best judge of his
own speech. From the teachers point of view, consistent errors indicated
in spontaneous speech indicate weaknesses in the listening capacity. The
errors of speech are thus not corrected directly, but noted for further
training in careful listening. In other words, if a teacher accepts the
second position, that all performances are perceptually controlled, then
all learning is perceptual learning, and the task of the teacher is to
enhance the student's perceptual capacity.
The viewpoint is new. It is not yet, "common sense". Nevertheless,
it seems that cybernetic feedback theory has great potential for the future
in foreign language teaching as well as in the various scientific disciplines.
It seems premature to dismiss it as another fad, it seems more advisable
to understand it better. This paper was presented in the belief that this
new point of view could indeed create a "Copernican Revolution" in foreign
language teaching.
Selected References
Ackoff, Russell. Redesigning the Future. New York: Wileylnterscience, 1974.
Adams, J. A. "A closed loop theory of motor leaning." Journal of Motor Behavior Vol. 3 (2) 1971.
Annet, J. Feedback and Human Behavior. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1969
Arbib, Michael A. The Metaphorical Brain. New York: Wileylnterscience, 1972.
Ashby, W.R. "Adaptiveness and equilibrium." Journal of Mental Sciences, 1940, 86, p.478483.
Asher, J.J. "The Learning Strategy of the Total Physical Response: a Review." Modern Language Journal, L, 1966, p.7984.
Asher, J.J. "The Total Physical Response Approach to Second Language Leaning." Modern Language Journal, Lmp Jan. 1969, p.317.
Asher, J.J. "Children's First Language as a Model for Second Language Leaning." Modern Language Journal, LVI, 1972, p. 13339.
Asher, J.J. Learning another language through actions: the complete teacher s guidebook. Los Catos, Cal.: Sky Oaks Productions. 1977.
Bandura, Albert. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: PrenticeHall, 1977.
Bartlett, F.C. Remembering Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932.
Belasco, Simon. "C'est la guerre? or Can Cognition and Verbal Behavior Coexist?" Language and the Teacher. A Series in A pplied Linguistics. Vol. XV~~: Toward a Cognitive Approach to Second Language Acquisition, ed. Robert C. Lugton, Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development, Inc. 1971.
Brown, 1. "Modeling Processes and Language Acquisition: The Role of Reference." Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1976, 22: 195-199.
Buckley, Walter. (ed) Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist.
Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1968.
Campbell, Jeremy. Crammatical Man. London: Penguin Books, 1982.
Driven, Rene & John OakeshottTaylor, "Listening Comprehension (Part I) Language Teaching and LinguisticAbstracts, 17, 4, 326343, 1984.
Driven & Taylor "Listening Comprehension (Part 11) Language Teaching and LinguisticAbstracts, 18, 1, 2-20, 1985.
Fairbanks, G. "Systematic research in experimental phonetics: a theory of the speech mechanism as a servosystem. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1954, 19, 133-139.
Fairbanks, G. "Selective vocal effects of delayed auditory feedback. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1955, 20, 33346.
Gary, J. "Delayed oral practice in initial stages of second language learning. In M. Burt & H. Dulay (ed.) IVew direction in second language teaching, learning and bilingual education. Washington, D.C.: TESOL 1975.
Gary, J. & Gary, N. "Caution: talking may be dangerous to your linguistic health. Thc case for a much greater emphasis on listening comprehension in foreign language instruction. IRAL, 19, l, 114, 1981.
Geschwind, N. "Language and the Brain," Scientific American (April 1972)
Krashen, S.D. "The Monitor Model for adult second language performance." in M, Burt, H. Dulay, and M. Finocchiaro (eds.) Viewpoints on English as a Second Language. New York: Regents, 1977, p. 152161.
Krashen, S.D. Second language acquisition and second language learning Oxford: Pergamon Press. 1981.
Krashen, S.D. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 1982.
Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Lackner, James. "Speech Production: evidence for corollary discharge stabilization of perceptual mechanisms." Perceptual and Motor SkSls, 1974, 39, p.899-902.
Luria, A R. The WorkingBrain New York: Basic Books, 1978.
Maslow, A. The Psychology of Science. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1966.
Miller, David and Starr, Martin K. The Structure of Human Decisions. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1967.
Miller, G., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K., Plans and the Structure of Behavior New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960.
Miller, James G. LivingSystems. New York: McGrawHill Book Co., 1978.
Nord, James R. "A Case for Listening Comprehension." Philogogia, 7 Mie University, Japan, March. 1975.
Nord, James R. "Developing listening fluency before speaking: an alternative paradigm." System, 8, 1, 122, 1980.
Nord, James R. "The SensIt Cell Model" Kanagawa University Foreign Language Bulletin vol. 6, 1983.
Osgood, Charles E. "A Behavioristic Analysis of Perception and Language as Cognitive Phenomena." In Contemporary Approaches to Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1964.
Paivio, Allan & lan Begg. Psychology of Language. New Jersey: PrenticeHall, Inc. 1981.
Palmer, Harold. English ThroughActions. Tokyo: Kaikakusha, 1925.
Postovsky, V. A. Effects of Delay in Oral Practice at the Beginning of Second Language Learning. Ph. D. Dissert, U. of Calif. Berkeley, 1970.
Postovsky, V.A. "Effects of Delay in Oral Practice at the Beginning of Second Language Learning. " Modern Language Journal, Lvm Sept. 1974.
Powers, William T. Behavior: the Control of Perception. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1973.
Powers, William T. "Feedback: Beyond Behaviorism" Science Vol. 179, Jan. 1973. Rapoport, A. "Preface" Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, ed. Walter Buckley, Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co. 1968.
Richards, I.A. Design for Escape, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc. 1968.
Rivers, Wilga "Listening Comprehension." Modern Language Journal 50: 196204, April 1966.
Rivers, Wilga "Comprehension and Production: The Interactive Duo." Paper presented at AILA conference, Brussels 1984.
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. "Behavior, purpose and teleology," Philosophy of Science, 1943, 10, 1824.
Smith, Karl U. and Smith, Margaret Foltz. Cybernetic Principles of Leaning and Educational Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966.
Sperry, R.W. "Lateralization of function in the surgically separated hemispheres." in F. J. McGuigan & R. Schoonover (Ed ), The Psychophysiology of thinking New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Turner, F. and Poppel, E. "The neural Iyre: Poetic meter, the brain and time." Poetry, Aug. 1983.
Welford, A.T. "Behavioral approach to motor programing," Brain Research. 71. 1974. p.379462.
Wiener, Norbert Cybernetics. New York: Wiley, 1948.
Wiener, Norbert The human use of human beings. New York: Doubleday and Co. 1954.
Winitz, Harris, (Ed.) The Comprehension Approach to Foreign Language Instruction, Rowley, Mass: Newbury House, 1981.
Winitz, H. and Reeds, J. "Rapid acquisition of a foreign language (German) by the avoidance of speaking." IRAL, 1973 11, 295317.
Winitz, H. and Reeds, J. Comprehension and problem solving as strategies for language training The Hague: Mouton, 1975.
von Foerster, Heinz "Perception of the Future and the Future of Perception." Instructional Science, 1 972.
Young, Z. Programs of the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Zurif, Edgar, "Language Mechanisms: a Neuropsychological Perspective"
American Scientist, MayJune 1980. p.305311.