| Related to the authorship issue are the striking similarities in John's Gospel to the letters, particularly 1 John. There seems to be no evidence that 1 and 2 John have been edited by an overseeing board of any sort, so that (in my opinion) the overall language, theology, and other similarities between John's Gospel and letters would appear on those grounds to support a theory of single authorship of both. Specific parallels between John's prologue and 1 John include, as mentioned, a strong anti-Gnostic element. Internal evidence from 1 John indicates an ongoing and even intensified effort on the part of the author to combat Gnosticism. Not one to beat around the bush, John translates his general assertion of the deity and humanity of Christ ("and the Word became flesh") from the Gospel into a litmus-test of the faith in 1 John: "...Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God" (4:2-3). Indeed, John's confessional statement - "In the beginning was the Word... and the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory" (v. 1, 14) - has a direct parallel to the opening words of 1 John: "That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life - the life was manifested..." (v. 1-2). In both texts the Word is divine ("from the beginning") and yet is fully human ("became flesh" or "was manifested"). Dualistic concepts in John surface as well in 1 John. While the incompatibility of light and darkness, for instance, is a major theme of John's entire Gospel, including the prologue, so it appears in 1 John (1:-6; 2:8-11). Among the Gospels, John's is unique. That fact has long been recognized by Bible scholars and is really accentuated by the prologue to John. So how does this text in John relate to the Synoptics? To begin, the prologue itself has no real parallel in the Synoptics whatsoever. Matthew and Luke each preface their respective Gospels with an abbreviated genealogical record, while Mark basically jumps right into the story with the preaching of John the Baptist in fulfillment of OT prophecy. John, much to the contrary, leads into the story of John the Baptist with this profound theological commentary. John's prologue also introduces a number of terms and themes which contribute to an almost systematic theological treatment of the Gospel record. For John, history is incidental and theology (or Christology) is central - that is, history properly understood points us to the ultimate theological reality, Christ himself. Unlike the Synoptics, John seems to regard theological development as more important than the purely objective recording of historical events. (In fact, he might be inclined to argue that a purely objective record is impossible to obtain in the first place.) This is one reason Clement of Alexandria referred to John as a "spiritual gospel" (rather than an historical Gospel.) Of course, John was in all likelihood aware of the Synoptic material already in existence, and arguably was under no compulsion to produce what would have become essentially a Fourth Synoptic Gospel. For failure to recognize his situation, John is too often misunderstood as a mystic, or even as a Gnostic. As we have seen, no one is more opposed to Gnosticism than John. So he's not one to be easily pigeonholed. On the other hand, John's theology is fully orthodox, and this is where his alliance with the Synoptics is indisputable (and his differences with them overstated). Where it counts the most, the Gospels are in complete agreement: Jesus is the center of attention: He is the Son of Man, preceded by John the Baptist, anointed by the Spirit, who teaches with authority and not as the scribes and Pharisees, who feeds the multitudes, who preaches the truth so as to open the eyes of the blind, who is delivered up by the Jews and crucified under the authority of Pontius Pilate, and who rises from the dead in victory. Indeed, John's prologue could be seen not only as a summary of his own Gospel, but as a basic statement of the gospel message of all four evangelists and attested by the entirety of Scripture: "For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ" (John 1:17). |
|||||
| Back to Theology Page | |||||
| Home | |||||