|
@ a glance - Affordable housing Improve basic strategies. - Take an active, not reactive approach to development. - Say goodbye to the derelict building. - Prioritize full-time residencies, fund projects with taxes on part-time units. - Support independent homeowner-initiatives to increase housing, encourage secondary suites. - Offer incentives for creators of new rental property. - Beware of pigs and wolves protect residents' rights and enforce smart, progressive bylaws.
The Simple Solution Most of us know the story of
the three little pigs. For me, the most frightening part of the
story has always been at the very beginning. The part where their
mother decides her young will have to seek out their own property
in the competitive real estate market. I tend to believe this has
something to do with the housing situation in my hometown/city
hybrid of Victoria, where leaving home results in one of two
common scenarios: our youth are either discouraged by some of
the highest house prices in Canada and reluctantly move away,
or are forced to live in less-than-ideal units (often illegally)
and rely on loans to help with common expenses such as gas, food
and post-secondary education. More than a social issue, the
lack of affordable housing - together with competition from prime
vacation property and some of the best university facilities
in Western Canada contributes to a devastating shortage
of productive employees. As a result, local business owners and
industries struggle to find workers and only large corporations
offering record-high wages and benefits are properly staffed. There are many advocates and
organizations that have worked tirelessly to expand the amount
of reasonably priced homes, and it hasn't been for nothing. But
to reach beyond the confines of subsidized cluster-housing and
time-restricted residencies, we must review our approach to accommodating
the many long-term individuals and families who feel isolated,
restricted, and increasingly unable to live in their own city. Resources from the municipality's
affordable housing fund, higher levels of government and non-profit
organizations must be used wisely, but quickly, in areas where
opportunities for social development is quickly diminishing.
Unless we invest in the future through affordable units today,
we will find ourselves in a city without diversity, cohesiveness,
or economic stability tomorrow. Our downtown plans must also
take into account the need to relieve tensions growing between
economic classes and the intelligent integration of shelters,
assisted living spaces, affordable single housing and family-friendly
units for low-income Victorians. Last but not least, we must
communicate regularly with current citizens and conclude with
a shared understanding of the variance between different levels
of subsidized housing and the options for ensuring harmonious
integration and collaborative partnerships between development
of every status. Thanks to a lack of long-term
planning and general insight, Victoria's bid to expand its population
capacity is poisoned with a curse of irony. The bigger half of our council
will tell you that the sky-rocketing real estate prices in Victoria
are market-driven, and the bigger half of our council is correct.
But the local government's affect on housing should not be overlooked,
and our reactive approach to obtaining what we want is boosting
property taxes and increasing the cost of achieving what we need:
Affordable housing. There are still too many new
buildings being created that aren't supported by their neighbours
or their neighbourhoods. In large part, the city approves re-zoning
applications and density and height-increases in these projects
because it feels a certain responsibility to react to the demand
for housing and support development interests. In truth, these actions are
misguided. By using the resources our neighbourhood associations
willingly provide as volunteers, we can and must update neighbourhood
plans and use them as strict guidelines and not suggestions,
for approving development projects. This way, neighbourhoods would
grow in the desired and planned directions and zoning would be
reflective of what genuinely made sense. What does this have
to do with affordable housing? Without the relaxed, reactive
and developer-friendly policies in Victoria, housing would increase
through intelligent design and development that was not cost
effective simply would not happen. Consequently, property values
and taxes would be reduced to reasonable averages creating a
more friendly community for personal, casual and small-business
development and, of course, affordable housing. It's time to stop resisting the wisdom of neighbourhood associations and community-interest groups and start to work with them, in conjunction with local developers, towards a smart, sustainable future. The Derelict Debate Somehow, and despite a huge
demand for downtown property, through the rate of real estate
inflation we have created a market climate that is dangerously
close to rewarding owners of unused, wasted space. We end up
with building that could accommodate hundreds of residents in
need of housing but instead are tightly borded up so that even
exterior alcoves cannot be occupied by members of our homeless
population. We must take direct action to discourage property owners that are hoping for eased restriction or future buy-outs from leaving their land abandoned. These issues can be controlled through forced historical-designation, property tax increases and specific abandoned-property bylaws. Space and Time is Precious Victoria is a famed vacation
spot, and such a valued getaway that many extended-families with
ties to Victoria and frequent travelers have even acquired their
own units in the city. Unforunately, a result of this
is that sought-after living accommodations are only occupied
for a fraction of each year, while long-term residents with only
temporary, secure housing struggle in the busy tourist months
of summer and the dead of winter when our cross-location citizens
find refuge in our temperate climate. Furthermore, the city has to
manage administrative duties and make resources available to
all units without knowing when they will contribute to energy
or water usage. Increased taxes on part-time residencies would help offset their socio-economic expense and encourage shared housing with pre-planned time-schedules. This policy would also insure that for an added expense, people in need of a constantly-available alternative residence could still keep Victoria as a viable second location to their primary hometown or city. Big Development is Only One Housing Solution While condominiums and new or refurbished houses contribute to the expansion of our working city, it's often older rental buildings, secondary-suites and shared living spaces that our working class, our seniors and our youth build their lives around. We should continue to research and adjust residency laws so we can legalize safe accommodations that don't already 'fit the bill.' We must also encourage and not turn-down resident's own attempts to create safe, secondary homes on their properties. It is illogical and immoral to tell these individuals that they can not expand their own, private, density within the legal limits even while we approve multi-million-dollar projects that fail to match the specifications designated for the properties on which they are based. Revival of the Rental Without permanently committing
to dealing with an issue that should, by all definitions, be
federally resolved, we should explore ways of locally increasing
our amount of new rental housing. It's true that it's not often economically viable to build new rental units in this city, but, as per usual, we have local advocates and philanthropists that have made it happen regardless. Recognizing that it can be done, we should consider options such as property tax-relief for new, affordable, rental-housing initiatives. The Right of the Resident (a short story)
I'm not even going to talk
about big bad wolfs; truth is, low-rent residents in Victoria
often assume a number of problems along with housing. Through
by-law enforcement officers and the Vic PD we need to enforce
laws that make sense and ensure that landlords maintain safe,
legal space and respond to the concerns of their residents when
things go wrong. Issues of damaged and unkempt housing and illegal
activity in multi-unit buildings only gives a negative impression
to the concept of 'affordable housing' and provides misleading
justification for developments that shift options away from low-income
renters. Just as problematic, there are a number of given practices in the process of acquiring residents (such as requiring SIN identification) that are, at best, unethical. It is within our power to adjust the standards through education and enforcement. *April 2008 figure from the Victoria Real Estate Board
|