20 | |
november | december 2000 | No Compromise The Music Hall MMF-2.1 - joseph taylor |
. Description: belt-driven 2-speed turntable Dimensions (w x h x d): 16.5" x 4.5" x 12.5" Weight: 17 lbs., platter: 4.5 lbs. Price (US retail): US$ 300.00, includes tonearm and factory installed Goldring Elan cartridge Warranty: Call manufacturer for more info. Manufacturer Info: Music Hall 108 Station Road Great Neck, NY 11023 Tel: (516) 487-3663 Fax: (516) 773-3891 Web: http://www.musichallaudio.com E-mail:[email protected] |
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MMF-2.1 Goldring
Elan Cartridge ALTHOUGH the Music Hall
MMF 2.1 is among the lowest priced quality turntables, calling it “entry
level” is inaccurate. It
performs better than that description would suggest. Chances are you’ll have to pick up the MMF 2.1 through a mail order
retailer, unless you know a stereo shop that stocks or special orders
turntables. If you can buy
the turntable from a shop that will set it up for you, do so. If you can’t, it’s not too big of
a problem. The MMF 2.1 comes with the cartridge installed, leaving you to
assemble only a few things.
Depending on your experience setting up turntables you should have
it up and running in 30 minutes or less.
SETTING
UP The MMF 2.1 arrives tightly packaged. I had to remove the dustcover, which is packed at the top of the box, to get to the plinth (i.e. the turntable chassis--DH). I placed the plinth on the turntable shelf of my rack and removed the motor transport screws that protect the motor from damage during shipping. They’ re easy to find since they’re painted red. I then retrieved the drive belt from one of the enclosed parts bags. Music Hall thoughtfully provides a spare belt; make sure you put it where it won’t get lost. Turntable belts don’t break or wear out easily, but you’ll be glad you have the spare stored away if you do have to replace the first one. I slipped the belt over the upper tier of the motor pulley, for 33 1/3 speed and around the sub platter. [1], I placed the platter and felt mat over the spindle on the sub platter. The platter weighs 4½ lbs.; pretty hefty for a table as inexpensive as the MMF 2.1. Then came the hard work--balancing the tonearm and setting the
tracking weight. I removed
the red tonearm transport lock, which holds the tone-arm on its rest
during shipping. I found the counterweight, used to apply the stylus’s
downward force, tucked safely away in the packing material. I lifted the tonearm from the arm
rest, removed the stylus guard, and positioned the arm halfway between the
platter and the arm rest. I
slowly twisted the counterweight onto the rear of the tonearm, until the
tone-arm floated freely, parallel to the plinth. I was sure to release the arm
carefully as I checked that it floated parallel, so as not to let the
stylus thump down on the plinth. I put the tone-arm back in the arm rest. As it was now balanced, I needed
to set the tracking force indicator so that it read “zero,” as in zero grams of downward
force. This indicator is a
ring around the tonearm that sits snug up against the counterweight. So that I wouldn’t upset the
tonearm’s balanced state, I held the counterweight still while I turned
the indicator ring so that it read "0." (As you can imagine, one slip of
the fingers and the tonearm and stylus can easily crash against the
plinth. Consequently, I
calibrated the tracking force indicator while the tone-arm was in its
holder.) I had to balance the
tonearm a couple more times because my attempts to move the indicator to
read “zero” caused the counterweight to shift—I mentioned that they sit
snugly together. The tracking force indicator ring loosened a little by
the third and final reset.
Once I had the indicator reading “zero” and I could trust that the
tonearm was truly set at zero grams of downward force, I turned the
counterweight until the ring indicated that I had applied 1.7 grams of
force. Checking on the
accuracy of this indicator ring, I measured the tracking force with a
Shure stylus tracking force gauge. The gauge indicated a force a couple of
tenths shy of 1.7, so I rotated the counterweight a notch to add a little
more weight. Finally, I set the anti-skating force. (This prevents the needle from
jumping out of the groove and sliding across the record.—DH) Most inexpensive turntables use a
spring-loaded anti-skate mechanism. The MMF 2.1 uses an anti-skate weight
that hangs by a microfilament line at the back of the tonearm assembly,
just above the arm itself. I hung the looped end from the prescribed
notch--you hang the weight from one of three notches, according to
tracking weight--and threaded the remaining microfilament line through the
loop in the anti-skating lever (actually an angled piece of thin metal
fixed at the tone-arm base). I measured the stylus alignment before I played any records. The turntable comes with a
Goldring Elan cartridge installed and, according to my alignment tool, it
was placed correctly in the headshell. The MMF 2.1 allows for azimuth and
vertical tracking angle (VTA) adjustment, an almost unheard of fine-tuning
capability in a ‘table of its price range. The azimuth is the tracking angle
of the cartridge when viewed head-on. It should be perfectly horizontal.
Vertical tracking angle is the angle at which the cartridge tracks when
viewed from the side.
Generally, the VTA is correct if the bottom of the cartridge is
parallel to the record. Being able to fine-tune the VTA is a significant
benefit, since cartridge dimensions vary. I
eyeballed both the azimuth and the VTA on the MMF 2.1. The azimuth was fine, but the VTA
as set at the factory was a little higher than the user’s manual
suggests. I have LPs of a
variety of thicknesses, though, from very thin ‘70s dynaflexes to 180-gram
pressings. I placed a few of
them on the ‘table and felt the cartridge was a tiny bit too low on the
dynaflex LPs, of which I have very few, but just right on standard and 180
gram pressings. I left it as it was.
LISTENING I wanted to give the
cartridge some break-in time before I listened carefully, but I also
wanted to play a few LPs right off to give myself a point of
reference. As I dropped the
stylus on the first record, I was impressed with the precision of the
cueing device.[3] It worked smoothly and allowed a
gradual drop to the record surface.
As the stylus made contact with the lead-in groove I immediately
noted how quietly the turntable played. I heard no extraneous noise. My
Dual 606, which cost me $250.00 15 years ago and didn’t include a
cartridge, is positively clamorous by comparison during the lead‑in and
between tracks (I use it in my basement system).
The tone-arm on my old
Dual picks up vibration through the plinth, which is made of molded
plastic and is not well isolated from its base. The Dual’ s plinth is
supported by a spring at each corner and each spring rests on a corner of
the base of the turntable. By contrast, the plinth of the MMF 2.1 is made
of a dense material that resists vibration and resonance and the drive
motor floats on its own suspension, actually a heavy rubber band that
stretches over four corner screws in a cavity just above and to the left
of the sub platter. These elements, combined with the heavy platter, make
the MMF 2.1 an astonishingly quiet ‘table for the money.
From the first record, I
was struck by the music’s transparency and by the precise placement of
images within the soundstage.
I played an old, fairly noisy copy of The
Hawk Swings, a Coleman Hawkins LP from 1960. The instruments came
out from the speakers, well separated from the background pops and
clicks. More important, they
were separated enough from the background noise to enable me to hear the
timbre of the instruments. Thad Jones ’s trumpet and Eddie Costa’s vibes
in particular rang out clear and true.
The cartridge took about
20 hours to burn in to the point that an initial brightness I’d heard in
pop vocals was completely gone.
I listened to “Grass, ” the second track on XTC’s Skylarking.
That track is
particularly revealing of cartridges in the under $50 dollar range, which
produce so much sibilance on this track that they’re unlistenable. The
supplied Goldring cartridge, which costs about $60, placed the vocals in
"Grass" and in other, less demanding tracks, dead center and slightly
forward, without sibilance. The Goldring Elan
performed well across a broad spectrum of music. I demo’d the turntable for a
friend of mine who wants to replace his old ‘table. I played a Japanese pressing of Abbey
Road that is one of the quietest pressings I’ve ever heard;
there’s absolute silence in the lead in groove and between cuts. The tonal
differences in the various drums during the solo near the end of the suite
on side two are more pronounced on that LP than on any other format I’ve
heard, including the CD. The
Elan reproduced those tones distinctly, perhaps not as distinctly as my
usual cartridge (an Ortofon OM30, which costs about four times as much),
but very well for the price. My friend brought along a
UK, yellow-vinyl pressing of Yellow
Submarine. I was especially
impressed with the almost textural feel of the ocean waves on the title
track. Similarly, the MMF 2.1
and the Elan reproduced the crickets and birds in Skylarking on a beautifully
layered soundstage. Walking
away from the speakers I imagined a bird alighting on my shoulder.
The Elan has a very rich
and detailed midrange. I played Reinforcements
by Brian Auger’s Oblivion Express, and was pleased with the sound of
the Hammond B3 on the opening track, "Brain Damage." I could almost feel
the air from the Leslie speaker.
The trumpet and sax on a Blue Note Connoisseur 180 gram mono
pressing of J.R. Monterose’s self-titled LP sounded vivid and
detailed. Ira Sullivan’s
trumpet solos had a smooth, open tone and there was a pleasing grain to
the sax solos. I was impressed overall
with the speed and accuracy of the cartridge. It had no trouble handling
the transients in "No Pasaran" from Joe Jackson’s Will Power. The sudden bursts of
brass came through sharply and sustained well. Art Blakey’s cymbal work on
the Monterose LP was remarkably clear without being bright or shimmery and
showed no hint of decaying too quickly. During the intro to "Out of Time"
from a mono pressing of the Rolling Stones’ Flowers, I found myself smiling as
I heard the rasp of the finger snaps and the reverb that accompanied
them.
I did feel that the
cartridge had slight problems revealing detail in some symphonic
recordings. A playing of an RCA "shaded dog" pressing of Shostakovich’s Symphony No. 1 displayed a
pleasing, satiny warmth overall and a beautiful large hall ambiance, but I
had a little trouble identifying individual instruments in the lower
register during densely orchestrated passages. A London records pressing
of Bartok’s Concerto for Orchestra
from 1988 yielded similar results, while a Columbia Masterworks mono
pressing of Mozart’s Four Horn
Concertos, which has fewer low register passages than the other two
LPs, was more detailed overall. I also found that the
attack on the stand‑up bass on one or two acoustic jazz recordings was a
tiny bit less than I’m used to hearing, although there was plenty of bass
presence. I should point out,
however, that on the J. R. Monterose LP, Wilbur Ware’s bass solos came
through with striking detail and I could hear the strings interacting with
the wood of the instrument.
My turntable rests on a wooden platform that is supported by a
series of polymer balls (a cheap tweak I got from the web). Removing the platform and placing
the MMF 2.1 directly on my audio rack actually tightened up the bass a bit
without adding any vibration induced noise--go figure.
I
had an unexpected opportunity to push the MMF 2.1's tracking abilities to
their limit. I picked up a used copy of Happy Moods by Ahmad Jamal in an
original Argo pressing. I’m
always excited to find Jamal’s records, particularly the Argo pressings,
so I was disappointed that the record had a significant warp. I decided to give it a shot
anyway, and the MMF 2.1's tonearm rode over it like a champ. That’s one
area where Dual’s ULM tonearms excelled; they could ride all but the most
extreme warp. The Music Hall arm gives them a run for the money. I didn’t even detect any tonal
variation (wishful thinking, perhaps, on my part).
SUMMARY The few and slight
limitations, attributable to the cartridge, didn’t diminish my enjoyment
of this turntable. I listened
for a couple of hours at a time, minimum, and never became fatigued. Still, for those seeking more
Goldring makes a number of cartridges ranging in price from the Elan to
the Excel VX, a moving coil cartridge that fetches about a grand. However, Roy Hall at Music Hall
notes that the tone arm bearings on the MMF 2.1 preclude use of a moving
coil cartridge. Aside from
that proviso, I can’t imagine this turntable not doing justice to a very
good, very revealing cartridge.3 While you save for that cartridge,
you’ll get plenty of enjoyment from the Music Hall MMF 2.1 as is.
After having the MMF 2.1 around for a couple of months, I decided
it was time to retire my Dual ‘table. It gave me close to 20 years of
reliable service, but, after living with the Music Hall ‘table for a
while, it seemed like a compromise.
I bought the MMF 2.1 to take its place.
JOSEPH's REVIEW SYSTEM Yamaha AX-592 Integrated Amp 1 Music Hall provides a
plastic tool for moving the belt to the lower tier. You lift the platter
off the spindle and the sub platter and use the tool to shift the belt
down. You don’t want to use your fingers because skin oils could cause the
belt to slip and, over time, to deteriorate. 3 The Music Hall MMF 2.1 is
a completely manual turntable.
4 Goldring makes a
replacement stylus for the Electra cartridge that fits into the Elan and
is a more detailed stylus. Copyright © 1997 - 2000 Interactive
Orbit, Inc. All rights reserved. |