Joe Bruman's
Current Science Reviews (CSR)
on Parkinson's disease
Browse CSR Index by Month DEC 94 JAN 95 FEB 95 MAR 95 APR 95 MAY 95 JUN 95 JUL 95 AUG 95 SEP 95 OCT 95 NOV 95 DEC 95 JAN 96 FEB 96 MAR 96 APR 96 MAY 96 JUN 96 JUL 96 AUG 96 SEP 96 OCT 96 NOV 96 DEC 96 JAN 97 FEB 97 MAR 97 APR 97 MAY 97 JUN 97 JUL 97 AUG 97 SEP 97 OCT 97 NOV 97 DEC 97 JAN 98 FEB 98 MAR 98 APR 98 MAY 98 JUN 98 JUL 98 AUG 98 SEP 98 OCT 98 NOV 98 DEC 98 JAN 99 FEB 99 MAR 99 APR 99 MAY 99 JUN 99 JUL 99 AUG 99 SEP 99 OCT 99 NOV 99 DEC 99 JAN 00 FEB 00 MAR 00 APR 00 MAY 00 JUN 00 JUL 00 AUG 00 SEP 00 OCT 00 NOV 00 DEC 00 JAN 01 FEB 01 MAR 01 APR 01 MAY 01 JUN 01 JUL 01 AUG 01 SEP 01 OCT 01 NOV 01 DEC 01 Browse CSR Index by Subject A to Z Search CSR by Keyword
2001/01/13 CSR INDEX - revised
I have posted a "CURRENT SCIENCE REVIEWS" message every month for about 6 years. A separate cumulative INDEX to the CSRs is revised each month, too big (now about 29 pages) for regular posting, but available on individual request. The object at first was merely a private file where I could retrieve passing items which otherwise would be lost in the passing torrent of published information about PD, but it turned out to interest others, hence this intro:
For newcomers to the PIE, I need to tell you what the CSR is, and what it's not: As a new PD patient I wanted to learn all I could about the disease, especially the progress of research that might lead to improved treatment. I joined a local support group, who wanted a science input for their newsletter. While not a medical professional, I had access to a small medical library, where I could regularly scan a few of the more relevant journals, and translate their scientific jargon into English. So I started the monthly CSR, with these rules in mind:
I don't retain an article unless it is likely to have some historical significance.
- Stick generally to peer-reviewed articles, for authenticity.
- Avoid judgement, selection, or analysis, just list what turns up.
- Respect copyright restrictions.
CSR items describe current work which may or may NOT prove to be important. Each one is just a piece of the big PD jigsaw puzzle; What's more, I scan only those few relevant journals available in the small medical library that I patronize, so the CSR is NOT a good source for basic or comprehensive info about PD. It is NOT a good reference for archival material; there are big sophisticated services, such as Medline, which do that.
What the CSR does do is provide an inkling of where we are, what lies ahead. I started it for my own use, but of course I'm glad to share it with others of like inclination. Likewise, the CSR INDEX is not encyclopedic, but merely a clue to locate any particular item. You can look it up in the CSR of the date given, to see if you want to order the source article from your local library. Or, you can go direct to the source as cited. Despite its very limited scope, I have kept on with the CSRs because it's so handy. Looking at the world through a PC screen is like looking through a keyhole - no matter how fast, you see only one thing at a time. On paper, it's more like a dictionary, where you can compare several things at once. For example, in the recent thread about olanzapine, I found my 5 entries in less time than my PC takes to warm up.
I can fill e-mail requests for individual reviews, as cited in the cumulative subject Index, but remember that these are only reference citations. To see an actual article or abstract, you must use either Medline or a medical library that subscribes to the journal in question. The cited articles are from professional journals usually kept on file in medical libraries. The journal names are abbreviated, so that each citation will fit on one line, but the librarian should be able to decipher. University libraries generally are open, short of borrowing privilege, to the public. If you need only an abstract, many are available from the U.S. government PubMed website at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/To decide quickly whether to go that far, you can look up my very brief review in the Current Science Reviews for the month indicated (back to 1995), which are in the archives of this forum as well as in my own files and on my website.
Copyright 1999-2002
Joe Bruman
All Rights Reserved
back to
| a new voice/pdnet/words/more nuggets/current science reviews |
back to
| joe bruman's home page |
updated 2002/02/11