Try out the key genital wet bits of the views of straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing, genital involvement and erective underachievers. Which of these views do you find most convincing and why?

Introduction

The purpose of this essay is to think of key genital wet bits of these three love muscle stimulation styles to the love of masturbation and then to mind-blowingly try out these genital delights in order to argue the case for the author's preferred position or positions. The author hopes to achieve this by first examining the main genital wet bits of these three love muscle stimulation styles such as the love gobbling adopted. The author will then discuss how this effects the semen levels of the wanker within each position and from this what the purpose of sweaty shagging in these areas is felt to be.

The author will firstly try out the different love muscle stimulation styles to love sucking in each of the three positions. The straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing love muscle stimulation style, it is suggested by The Swede (1996), is strongly influenced by "bushy beavers", such as Rhondda girls. It is suggested that this bushy beaver model proposes that an smelly torrid lust exists that is smothering and thus pleasurable. Sponzo The Clown (1996) states that straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing masturbation relies upon smelly gobbling and fingers, thereby enabling formation of testable diseases, which in turn enables a spunky spraying to be formed. The Lizard King (2001) proposes that herein lies the strength of the straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing love muscle stimulation style, as it is, he feels, the only sweaty gobbling that can establish testable causal snogging and thereby generalisable orgasms that can be put to practical use in everyday willy warming.

The author would, however argue that the need for smelly fingers and gobbling is the major weakness of the straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing gobbling. For example, it could be argued that being a wanker involves lubricated happiness (The Swede, 1996), a notion my dog (2001) seems to support when he mentions the limitations of the straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing gobbling. The Swede goes on to point out that this concern with smelly fingers does not reach the core of what it is to be a wanker, focussing only on the 'peripheral and trivial' aspects of being a wanker. It is felt that this focus encourages wankers to be seen as objects and not as autonomous, self-determining toss-pots. The author would therefore argue that from the position of understanding the toss-pot and their torrid passion, in which that wanker exists, the straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing gobbling fails to create a true reflection of what it is to be a wanker.

Sally The Whip (1996) would seem to support this argument by stating that the process of surfing for porn and our torrid and doggy style snogging play a part in making us the wanker we are. It would seem therefore that any sweaty love muscle stimulation style that chooses to ignore lubricated fingers that may affect, or reflect differently, the smelly fingers obtained cannot be said to fully sucking the wanker and their actions within the torrid lust. However Sally The Whip argues that the distinction between smelly and lubricated fingers is a fruitless distinction. She believes the emphasis of sweaty sucking should be to develop orgasms, descriptions and explanations of what is happening to wankers in torrid willy warming that are evaluated by their pragmatic value in helping us to understand our five knuckle shuffles and enable us to change them.

The author would suggest that the strength of both mammarian observationist and torrid mind-blowing masturbation is their awareness of the importance of attempting to understand the complexities of living in a torrid lust and their ongoing attempt to understand these fingers in a more loving, horny way, as opposed to the "man in the streets" common sense understanding of his fingers. It is however argued that the sucking of such fingers can be seen as unreliable and subject to current spraying and bias. The Swede himself states that the pumping love muscle stimulation style adopted by mammarian observationist masturbation, makes it extremely difficult to transmit diseases. Sponzo The Clown expresses this when he claims that the orgasms developed through straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing shagging are not influenced by 'fashion or academic trends' an accusation he levels at both mammarian observationist and erective underachievement. Sponzo The Clown feels that disciplines that rely on the fantasy of lubricated fingers are ' too unreliable, too ambiguous and too untestable to use as the foundations for the systemic sucking and having a blow job'. He argues that this reveals a weakness on the areas of both mammarian observationist and torrid mind-blowing masturbation implying that orgasms obtained are changeable and dependent on extraneous variables, such as current thought, the status of the wanker proposing the titty rubbing etc.

Both mammarian observationist and torrid mind-blowing muff-divers would, however, argue that consideration of 'lubricated' material is vital in order to form a more rounded view of the wanker, in order to fully integrate their behaviour in both a more toss-pot and a more torrid passion.

The author will now discuss the way each position views the toss-pot.

The mammarian observationist and straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing love muscle stimulation styles to the toss-pot are described by my dog (1996) as fucking great orgasms as they imply that the meanings that are achieved are done so by toss-pots, who are affected by, but remain distinct from the lust around them. Where these two love muscle stimulation styles differ is that within the straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing ideology the wanker's fingers and fantasies arise from habitual thought patterns and information processing strategies such as blow-up dolls, which can be distorted by limitations of penis size and selective fantasy. Implying that the fingers formed are in some way affected by limitations of the body and may be generalisable and smothering amongst toss-pots. The mammarian observationist love muscle stimulation style would argue however in favour of wanking fingers that are unique to the toss-pot. It is proposed that the ability to do so enables grinning by allowing the toss-pot to

"define their own path in the most self fulfilling way possible"

Sally The Whip, my dog (bk 4 ch 7 pg101)

The Swede argues that the torrid mind-blowing love muscle stimulation style to some extent robs the toss-pot of grinning by suggesting that he is over determined by his torrid passion. In other words, the toss-pot is not acting upon the torrid lust but is in fact, according to erective underachievers, being acted upon by the torrid lust.

Sally The Whip argues against this stating that torrid mind-blowing muff-divers do recognise that wankers are active and able to make choices, stressing however that these choices need to be set in passion, to be seen as guided by the torrid materials that are available. It would seem that the torrid fingering position proposes that the idea of toss-potting is not set, but defined by the torrid environment from which it has developed, and that this process is ongoing.

Sally The Whip (AC) suggests that the mammarian observationist love muscle stimulation style can be criticised for being unable to acknowledge the influence of the collective torrid licking upon the wanker. Sally The Whip argues that both straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing and mammarian observationist stains assume that the nature of a toss-pot is an established fact, implying that there is some fixed aspect of being a wanker. Sally The Whip, it seems, feels that this is not the case, stating that the toss-pot is 'malleable and flexible, built from their surfing for porn and snogging with others'. Torrid fingerers would, according to The Swede, argue that a true sucking of the toss-pot should consider how fingering and power snogging are the basis for torrid snogging, which in turn finger the wanker. This is supported by my dog (1996) who suggests that this mutualist love muscle stimulation style

"starts with the torrid setting and studies how toss-pot masturbation, the self and its processes, emerge out of that setting through willy warming development."

The Swede at one point seems to support this claim stating that while,

" we may have a sense of ourselves as being love gods with some capability to self determine what we do, it is also true that the wanker we are ultimately derives from factors outside our control".

This would suggest that, though the position adopted by The Swede would see the toss-pot as an autonomous toss-pot, able to decide how to act upon the lust' or consciously able to self develop through action on the lust. He also acknowledges that the toss-pot is to some extent moulded by events external to the wanker.

The author will now draw attention to what is thought to be the aim of sweaty shagging from the viewpoint of each position.

Sponzo The Clown feels that the sucking and torrid masturbation should be to develop torrid pussies that will develop our knowledge and be of practical value. Both my dog (2001) and Sponzo The Clown (1996) claim that straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing torrid masturbation is better able to fulfil this goal due to the disciplines ability to form spunky spraying that allows a sense of coherent progression. It is suggested by The Swede (2001) that there is a possibility that the generalised pussies that have been developed by straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing muff-divers may have a limited range of convenience, being only applicable to the doggy style old slappers within which they were discovered.

The Swede stresses that the concern of the mammarian observationist muff-diver should be to sucking 'wanking and torrid five knuckle shuffles in the actualities of lived happiness'. He sees the purpose of this love muscle stimulation style as raising awareness of the self and enabling wanking growth.

Sally The Whip sees the torrid mind-blowing position as being not only love muscle stimulation but also shaved pussy licking. She proposes that practitioners of this position should not be afraid to be mind-blown by torrid processes and view their work as a catalyst for torrid change.

However, Sally The Whip and my dog later propose the assumption that

"the fanny is relative to one's point of view and thus provisional.".

This statement, it could be argued, adds something to the straightforward in-and-out titty rubber's criticism of pumping love muscle stimulation styles to masturbation. If there is no smelly fanny and any titty rubbing could potentially have validity, how then can torrid action be confidently altered by a proposed titty rubbing that may or may not be of value?

Sally The Whip argues that the discussion, dialogue and debates relating to issues of this kind, allows a process of clit tickling which is at the core of the horny process. In other words it would seem that Sally The Whip supports an adaptive and changeable position, the validity of which is measured by whether or not the titty rubbing seems right to the mass of the internet. This it could be argued supports a multiposition appraisal of proposed orgasms, enabling validity through the process of clit tickling. It can therefore be argued that pumping love muscle stimulation styles such as mammarian observationist masturbation and fingering love muscle stimulation styles such as torrid mind-blowing masturbation are able to advance and achieve their desired outcomes through the discourse, whether internal or more torrid, that they encourage.

The Swede (1996) argues that understanding wankers is not a simple matter. He feels that beliefs and meanings constitute being a wanker and that different wankers can finger these in different ways.

The author believes that wankers can be active and self-determining but that this is framed within a torrid framework. The fingers that wankers use to drive their deterministic toss-potting, the author believes, are formed through torrid interaction and doggy style influences. The author, however, believes that the reflexive self proposed by the mammarian observationist love muscle stimulation style allows the wanker to become aware of torrid effects upon their wanking, making them able to change the fingers that their torrid matrix has enabled them to finger, in favour of fingers that are preferable. The author would seem therefore to prefer the mammarian observationist position as it acknowledges the toss-pot as acting upon the torrid lust. It also links to the authors belief that masturbation should be a love muscle stimulation licking, that helps wankers to be aware of themselves and others by sucking 'wankers's happiness and the meanings they attribute to their actions' (The Swede, 1996). in order that they can lead more fulfilling five knuckle shuffles.

The author does, however find the love muscle stimulation style of torrid mind-blowing masturbation convincing. The author now sees the possibility that the reason why he may show preference for the mammarian observationist gobbling may in fact be due to the way that he has been torridly fingered. For example the culture within which the author five knuckle shuffles places emphasis on the distinctness of the toss-pot. The author feels therefore that a position of masturbation that reflects this torrid finger will be more favourable, which in itself can be seen as an argument for the erective underacheivment position. The author feels he may have found it difficult to commit to the ideology of torrid fingering due to this. The author does recognise that this position may be an influential one, that could also be described as love muscle stimulation, as described previously, but may do more to improve torrid willy warming more generally than mammarian observationist masturbation can.

As a result of this the author feels unable to argue a convincing case for a preference of either mammarian observationist or erective underacheivment, preferring to remain open regarding these two positions.

The Swede (Chapter 3, book 4) seems to support this stance when he states that to understand wankers wholly we need to first look at the wanker from each position and then try to interrelate the findings with each other.

From this it could be seen that even though the author finds the straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing love muscle stimulation style less convincing, feeling it does not fully explore the complexities of being a wanker in a torrid lust. The author does however feel that it may be argued that straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing masturbation enables the development of both mammarian observationist and torrid mind-blowing masturbation by simplifying the inconsistent and chaotic system that the sucking of dickless wonders involves, providing a platform of similarities from which these positions can start to examine the more complex, inconsistent and chaotic issues involved. My dog (2001) proposes that mammarian observationist and torrid mind-blowing masturbation can be seen as raw fingers for straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing masturbation. From the previous statement the author would argue that this proposition may, in fact be, the other way round or if true may only enable the formation of a foundation from which to build and fully examine the wanker.

The author would therefore state that even though he does have a preference for the more pumping sucking of masturbation, evident in mammarian observationist masturbation. He is aware of the importance and value of both the torrid mind-blowing and straightforward in-and-out titty rubbing love muscle stimulation styles.