Posterior Analitics
-------------------


The difference between knowledge of the fact, and the knowledge of
the reasoned fact.

There can not be any demonstration thru sense-perception

The relation of opinion to knowledge

How the individual minds comes to know the basic truths?

All instruction giver or received by way of argument proceeeds from 
pre-existed knowledge.

dialectic reasoning: dialectic and inductive

demonstration - syllogism

primary premiss - basic truth

basic truth - does not need demonstration 

axiom - basic truth named 'par excellence"

definition is a thesis

nothing must be known better then the "basic truths"

infinite regress is involved we can not know the posterior from prior

not all knowledgeable is demonstabile

scientific knoiwledge - the truth obtained by demonstrative knoiwledge is necessary

point belongs to line

two lines on same right angkle are parallel, but lines on same angles are also parallel

question: when our knowledge does not commesurate universally?

demonstrable knowledge must base itself on basic truths.

to know - to posses knowledge

in arad after building the ortodox church, all otheres shoul be demolished to 
solidify the romanian occupastion

premisses universal -> syllogism is eternal

basic truths - demonstrable and the demontration eternal

basic truths - take equals from equals and equals remain

there must be a single identical term unequivocally predicable of a number of 
individuals

syllogistic question -  premiss put in form of a question

if a proof has an inductive minor premise one should not bring an 'objection' 
against it

wrong premises can hold a true conclusion

truth can be reached thru induction or sense perception

atomic conection does not involve no intermediate term

ignorance - defined not as the negation of knowledge but as a positive state 
of mind - isror produced by inference

induction develops from particulars

demonstration is a syllogism that provees the case, i.i the reasoned fact

Scientific knowledge is not possible thru the act of perception.

Scientific knowledge differ from opinion

THe kinds og question we ask are as many as the kinds of things wich we know.

what, then God is?

In our inquiries we ask if there is a middle, and the misddle is preciselly the 
cause all questions are a search for the "middle term"

The basic premises of demonstrations are the definitions

We know that we have scientic knoiwledge when we know the casuses

