Ending of Suffering lies in understanding suffering, "to eliminate suffering" is meaningless because it is an interwoven aspect of Life.
As someone in this discussion previously had stated, Without suffering , pleasure makes no sense.
I aint saying that Suffering and Pleasure are eternal but was an abstemious manifestation of the Society as it was never capricious but the conundrum of relationships.
Post 2: what u said could be better exemplified as Detachment, Like u said everything we do is just for psychological security, My God, My wife, My house, My religion, My ethnicity and just because everything is "My" we are afraid of losing it and that is followed by pain and suffering and this is one big reason why we are afraid of death and the futility of the 'fact' is that we are attached to all the materialistic and worldly things that we have believed of them to provide us with pleasure which is just an illusion.
Soul:
The soul is so abstract that a reasoning beyond material realm is imminent
God
God is the one most debated thing in history, the notion of a superior being was concieved by humanity as they were illusioned to believe that the underlying necessity was not what they thought but which inevitably was psychological security.
The manifestation of material/earthly pleasures was heaven and if there is good then bad is... hence Hell, this immature misconception that explicitly alludes to the psyche is unwarranted.
This illusion still haunts humanity and the revolters (the so called athiests) have never revolted but are endowed with clarity...
Desire and Satisfaction :
Satisfaction will never relate itself to desire explicitly as desire never guarantees satisfaction fragmented or complete. Satisfaction has no control over desire just as desire cannot contol the former.
Secondly, it would be a gross misconception if I was to validate the gap between desire and satisfaction and not stress on the relations of cause and the effect on each other.
Absurdities always crop up; desire of immortality, trancendence... we cannot resolve any solution to this as this is what that has been immortalized.
Material desires persistently invoke the urge to suceed but satisfaction has no role here hence an early inclusion of satisfaction into mainstream desire will suffice for a better insight into the whole idea...
Fantasy:
Fantasy is purely of the psyche, it is a portrait of the ultimately manifestable reality in illusion. The fact that fantasy is fantasy is esoteric in the sense that it can be no more in the physical realm...
Globalism and morality:
Are we in a dilemma with regard to the moral implications of Globalism ??? Well it is quite and mostly improbable that we arrive at a conducive solution but the intriguing aspect of this fact being that we live in a world which unfortunately and fortunately has people who are not equivalent.
Considering the fortunate fact that all are not equivalent primarily negates an environment of moral reasoning as this fact clearly sidesteps our present dogma that all are to be treated equally and it is to be clearly understood that we should not reconcile the former and the latter.We here are not to discuss the validity but the relative aspect.
However, perfect equivalency is idealistic and understanding the primary response to a deviation from a biased state is vital.
Dogmatism:
Dogmatism is no more different than a child that accepts the society as it is, we can never really demarcate dogmatism from mainstream thought, it would be futile to sectarianize or segregate dogmatism but to accept the fact that this abberancy is purely individual...
Life:
Life is Vitality in all its exhuberence, but this is not a generalization and is vaguely attributed to be true as the subjects that experience life cannot be accepted as being one and if thats so then it would infer harmony.
Life is perfectly relative.
'Meaning' is not the thing and this also being relative we could never with alacrity assume that we are nowhere perspectively ambiguous of the fact
Philosophy and Science:
Whats the difference between Existence and Subsistence... it is but a diagnostic/charateristic of abstract Being. Let Existence be Philosophy and subsistence Science and the fact that this cannot be a derivative but a source is the actuality.
Science deals mostly with the directly observable; dealing with objective reality,modality and extrinsicality and philosophy lamely put i would deem it to encompass all... the inherence...