
Directions: Students will submit
responses to the questions in complete sentences on a separate sheet of
paper. Verbal proposals will be assessed using the following rubric.
|
CATEGORY
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
|
Respect for Other Team
|
All statements, body language, and responses were respectful
and were in appropriate language.
|
Statements and responses were respectful and used appropriate
language, but once or twice body language was not.
|
Most statements and responses were respectful and in
appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark.
|
Statements, responses and/or body language were consistently
not respectful.
|
|
Information
|
All information presented in the debate was clear,
accurate and thorough.
|
Most information presented in the debate was clear,
accurate and thorough.
|
Most information presented in the debate was clear
and accurate, but was not usually thorough.
|
Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually
not clear.
|
|
Rebuttal
|
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong.
|
Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and
strong.
|
Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant,
but several were weak.
|
Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant
|
|
Use of Facts/Statistics
|
Every major point was well supported with several relevant
facts, statistics and/or examples.
|
Every major point was adequately supported with relevant
facts, statistics and/or examples.
|
Every major point was supported with facts, statistics
and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable.
|
Every point was not supported.
|
|
Organization
|
All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise)
and organized in a tight, logical fashion.
|
Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise)
and organized in a tight, logical fashion.
|
All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise)
but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical.
|
Arguments were not clearly tied to an idea (premise).
|
|
Understanding of Topic
|
The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and
presented their information forcefully and convincingly.
|
The team clearly undestood the topic in-depth and presented
their information with ease.
|
The team seemed to understand the main points of the
topic and presented those with ease.
|
The team did not show an adequate understanding of
the topic.
|

|
|
Created by:
Jennise A Knight, [email protected]
Rawlinson Road Middle School, Rock Hill School District 3
2/19/04