ECRU 1100-006/007 Mid-Term I Answer Key
Give brief answer to the following questions. The answers must be brief, to the point and grammatically correct. Write clearly and legibly. There will be penalty for unreadable handwriting. (Time Allowed: 50 min.)
|
In billion $ |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
|
Nominal GDP |
6,244 |
|
6,931 |
|
Real GDP |
6,244 |
6,384 |
|
|
GDP Deflator |
|
102.6 |
105.0 |
Q = 24,000 - 500p Q = 6,000 + 1,000p, where p is price in $ and Q is the # of pairs per month.

i) Q = 22,000 – 500p * ii) Q = 22,000 + 500p
iii) Q = 27,000 – 500p iv) Q = 27,000 + 500p
Since changes in price will cause movement along the Qd-skdl, and any factors other than price will shift the Qd-skdl in, this will be reflected by the lower intercept of the Qd-skdl on the Q-axis.

i) Q = 3,000 + 1,000p ii) Q = 3,000 – 1,000p
iii) Q = 9,000 + 1,000p * iv) Q = 9,000 – 1,000p
Since changes in any factor other than price will cause the shift of the curve, and the # of shops means size of the industry, the basic Qs intercept must have .
e. Find the eqm price and quantity after the shift of the supply curve. (20 points)
*Note that by "instead" the question changes Qs.
3. From the following data, construct an expenditure skdl. Then, use the income-expenditure (45° line) diagram to determine the eqm level of GDP. (30 points)
|
Y |
C |
I |
G |
X- M |
|
3,600 |
3,100 |
240 |
120 |
40 |
|
3,700 |
3,200 |
240 |
120 |
40 |
|
3,800 |
3,400 |
240 |
120 |
40 |
|
3,900 |
3,600 |
240 |
120 |
40 |
|
4,000 |
3,700 |
240 |
120 |
40 |
Y=C+I+G+(X- M) only when Y=3,800. So, that’s where the Y (Income) and C+I+G+(X- M) (Expenditure) are in eqm, and thus, where Expenditure skdl and 45° line intersect.
Expenditure
C+I+G+(X- M)
3,800
45°
Y
3,800
4. Consider an economy that has a consumption function : C = 100 + 0.8Yd
The gov't budget is balanced w/ gov't purchases and taxes both fixed at 500. Net exports
are 100. Investment is 400.

b. How much saving is there in eqm? (Hint: Income not consumed must be saved.) Is saving
equal to investment in this case? What is the implication of this in/equality?

