| A lie about the Dewey Canyon III protest in which VVAW members "gave medals back" to their country" | ||||||||||||||||
| This is a significant falsehood that I'm sure was intentional. I found three separate instances (shown at the bottom of this page) in which O'Neill wrote that the protesters who threw military awards over a fence threw them into a bin marked "trash". Based on two sources of information about that protest I've concluded that it is at least 99% certain that the decorations landed on or near steps of the Capitol, with none going into any kind of container. One source is the film Going Upriver: the long war of John Kerry, which I saw Oct. 1, 2004. The other source is the book Home to War: the history of the Vietnam Veterans Movement. The film shows around five minutes of that protest, ending with a shot showing a pile of documents and medals on the bottom of some steps and upon pavement near the lowest step. It formed a mass around five feet square, and I could see no trash container or any other kid of container anywhere near the pile. The book Home to War has a description about something that happened after the last medals were thrown that has me convinced that using a trash bin would have been very repulsive to the men throwing the medals. The book says that after the last man threw his medals, two separate times some souvenier-seekers climbed the fence and tried to take some of the decorations. However, each time this happend veterans seeing it became enraged, Home to War says, climbing over the same fence and chasing the souvenier-hunters away. The book explains that many of the the medal-throwers regarded the souvenier-seekers as descrating the dead: many of the medals were those of close friends who had died in Vietnam. Going Upriver showed several instances of men naming the friends whose medals they were throwing. These occurances suggest that what O'Neill said (shown below) on page 143 about "everyone" assuming that Kerry threw away his medals is false. Surely everyone there assumed that the what Kerry threw over the fence could have been medals of one or more of his dead friends. The question arises: what motive could O'Neill have had to make this lie? I think there were several: (1) to make Kerry and the other protesters appear akin to extremist pacifists -- to seem as if they were rejecting all war, (2) to make the protest seem something like flag burning -- to make it appear as if they were getting rid of the medals entirely. |
||||||||||||||||
| From page 143: | ||||||||||||||||
| One by one, the VVAW protesters approached a microphone and threw their war decorations over a fence into a bin that had been marked "trash". Kerry, too, approached the microphone, said his piece, and three away a handfull of what everybody assumed were his medals. |
||||||||||||||||
| And from page 146: | ||||||||||||||||
| Any veteran loyal to America witnessing a demonstration in which veterans threw away their medals would be appalled. After all, this was the purpose of the entire event -- to shock America by showing it that Vietnam veterans so little valued their service that they were throwing their decorations in the trash. | ||||||||||||||||
| And from page 147: | ||||||||||||||||
| Today, John Kerry wants the American people to see his medals on the wall, as if they had always been there not his ribbons thrown away in the trash bin. | ||||||||||||||||