TANGIBLE AND
PERCEIVABLE
CONCLUSIVE PROOF
Islam is the fastest growing religion....
WHY?
Here is the TANGIBLE and PERCEIVABLE
CONCLUSIVE
PROOF.
Anyone at anytime and anywhere
can Perform the following experiment and obtain that PERCEIVABLE
PROOF.
1. INVITE 10 (TEN) people from everyday
life
who
say;
"I am a Christian and I
have read THE BIBLE".
Ask them just one question:
"Who was
Jesus, according to THE BIBLE?"
Please note down how many
DISSIMILAR BELIEFS
you have
obtained....
2.
INVITE 100 (HUNDRED) people from
everyday life
who
say;
"I am a Muslim and I have
read the QUR'AN".
Ask them just one question:
"Who was
Muhammad, according to the QUR'AN?"
Please note down how many
DISSIMILAR BELIEFS
you have
obtain...
IF THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF DISSIMILAR BELIEFS,
PERCEIVED &
UNDERSTOOD FROM THE
BIBLE,
BY 10 CHRISTIANS
DOES EXCEED THAT OF
THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF DISSIMILAR BELIEFS,
PERCEIVED &
UNDERSTOOD FROM THE
QUR'AN,
BY 10O MUSLIMS
WHAT DOES THAT PROVE
CONCLUSIVELY???
SELF
CONTRADICTIONS WITHIN A DIVINE SCRIPTURE
!!!
MUSLIMS HAVE ONLY ONE BELIEF
(Muhammad was the Messenger & the Servant of
Allah)
REBUTTAL FROM
answering-islam.org
Please visit http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Meherally/meh12_0.htm
to read the rebuttal to this article. You may be surprised to
see the followings:
1. The Critic writes:
(First off,
you'll have a hard time finding 10 Muslims who have
read the Qur'an in
Arabic...
a. How many
Christians would the Critic find, out of 10, who have read the Old
Testaments in Hebrew and the New Testaments in Greek?
(Here again the Muslims would outnumber the
Christians)
b. Is the Critic
trying to tell us that those who have read the translations of the
Bible and/or the Qur'an are not to be trusted?
2. The Critic's
LOGIC IS FLAWED AND DEFECTIVE by asking
those who have read THE QUR'AN:
"What is a Muslim according to the Qur'an?"
And those who have read THE BIBLE:
"What
is a Muslim according to the Qur'an?"
Should not the Critic be asking those who
have read THE BIBLE
"What is Christianity according to the
Bible?"
3. It is
obvious that the Critic has knowingly side-stepped the basic issue
of the DIVERSIFIED BELIEFS that the Bible reading Christians have
for their CHRIST JESUS from their own HOLY BIBLE.
One may argue Jesus WAS
NOT GOD and other may argue Jesus WAS GOD, by quoting enigmatic odd
verses from the same Bible.
Whereas, the QUR'AN is very clear as to the eminence
of Muhammad.
The Critic has not reproduce the last line
of my article which reads:
(Muhammad was the Messenger & the Servant of
Allah)
Author:
Akbarally Meherally
| 